How Does the Divergence Theorem Apply in Vector Calculus and PDE?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the divergence theorem in vector calculus to prove a specific integral identity involving a smooth function and its boundary. A suggested approach is to consider the vector function F(x,y,z) = (0, f(x,y,z), 0) to facilitate the proof. Additionally, there is a related query about verifying that the integral of the curl of a vector function over the boundary of a domain equals zero, using both Stokes' theorem and the divergence theorem. The participant notes their current coursework in vector calculus and PDEs, highlighting the early introduction of these concepts despite their later coverage in the curriculum. Understanding these theorems is essential for progressing in their studies.
Tony11235
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Suppose D \subset \Re^3 is a bounded, smooth domain with boundary \partial D having outer unit normal n = (n_1, n_2, n_3). Suppose f: \Re^3 \rightarrow \Re is a given smooth function. Use the divergence theorem to prove that

\int_{D} f_{y}(x, y, z)dxdydz = \int_{\partial D} f(x, y, z)n_2(x, y, z)dS

I think I see how they might be equal but I don't know where to start as far as proving it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:
Consider the vector function:
F(x,y,z)=(0,f(x,y,z),0)
 
While we're on it, I have another similar question. Say F:R^3 -> R^3 is a C^1 function, verifty that

\int_{\partial D} \nabla \times F \cdot n dS = 0

in two ways, first using Stokes theorem, then using the Divergence theorem.

By the way, I'm currently in vector calculus and at the same time first semester PDE. We don't cover the divergence theorem and such until way later into the semester. But our PDE book requires that you have some minor knowlegde of these theorems. And that's what our professor is having us do right now, especially for those of us that are currently in vector calculus.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top