How does the electron mass run with energy?

In summary, the neutrino mass does not run with energy in the same way as the electron mass does. The neutrino mass is renormalized by the weak interaction. There are no numbers available on how neutrino masses run up to the Planck energy, but the renormalization equations are quite simple.
  • #1
franoisbelfor
42
0
Renormalization in QED implies the running of charge and mass. But does the physical electron mass increase or decrease with energy? And what value is reached at the Planck energy? Somewhere I read that the mass change was 16%, but all books I on QED I searched do not give numbers. (Assuming the strong and weak interactions are neglected.)

Does anybody know a reference ?


François
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
From a "straightforward" calculation (as straightforward as these calculations can be!):

[tex]\frac{dm_e}{d\log\mu} = \left(\frac{3e^2}{8\pi^2}\right)m_e[/tex]

to one loop. So as you might expect from screening arguments, the mass increases in the UV.
 
  • #3
To add, you cannot neglect the weak interaction in the UV, as QED is the IR limit of part of the electroweak theory.
 
  • #4
quite right. the formula I gave is ONLY for QED at one loop - that means photon, electron and positron, NOTHING else. Strictly speaking, this is only correct in the UV up to the muon mass.

To get an accurate and correct number that describes the universe that we live in, of course you must go much further, including the other fermions (leptons and quarks), and then match to EW theory above the W boson mass, if you want to push the calculation up to the Planck scale (assuming that there's a desert from the weak to Planck scales).
 
  • #5
blechman said:
From a "straightforward" calculation (as straightforward as these calculations can be!):

[tex]\frac{dm_e}{d\log\mu} = \left(\frac{3e^2}{8\pi^2}\right)m_e[/tex]

to one loop. So as you might expect from screening arguments, the mass increases in the UV.

Ok, if one assumes hat the 511keV are measured at [tex]\mu= [/tex] 1 eV, and uses [tex]\left(\frac{3e^2}{8\pi^2}\right)=2.7*10^{-4}[/tex] one gets a electron mass at the Planck energy (10^28 eV) that is (10^28)^(2.7*10^-4)=1.018 times
higher than at 1 eV. Only 2% difference!

Is that correct? (This neglects weak and strong interaction effects, of course.)

François
 
  • #6
you have to be more careful:

(1) nothing runs below the electron mass itself, so you don't want to start the running at 1 eV, but at [itex]m_e(m_e)=[/itex]511 keV.

(2) you also have to take into account the (very important!) point that e^2 is not a constant but also runs, so the diffEQ is a little more complicated than what you naively wrote down. This will enhance the mass a bit.

But it is true that the effect is not very large... a few percent at most -- QED remains quite weak up to the Planck scale.

And of course, this is in a fictitious universe where there are no other forces or particles other than the electron, positron and photon. In other words, a homework problem, not a true physics result!
 
  • #7
blechman said:
you have to be more careful:

(1) nothing runs below the electron mass itself, so you don't want to start the running at 1 eV, but at [itex]m_e(m_e)=[/itex]511 keV.

(2) you also have to take into account the (very important!) point that e^2 is not a constant but also runs, so the diffEQ is a little more complicated than what you naively wrote down. This will enhance the mass a bit.

But it is true that the effect is not very large... a few percent at most -- QED remains quite weak up to the Planck scale.

And of course, this is in a fictitious universe where there are no other forces or particles other than the electron, positron and photon. In other words, a homework problem, not a true physics result!

Thank you very much! This was very illuminating. Even after recalculation, the effect
still is in the 2% range.

Thank you again!
François
 
  • #8
How does the NEUTRINO mass run with energy?

In a separate thread I was told very clearly that even at Planck energy, the electron mass is renormalized (by QED alone) only by a few percent. The renormalization equation is quite simple.

Now, what happens to the *neutrino* mass at Planck energy? Obviously, being neutral, the neutrino mass is not normalized by QED (well, at least not at first order), but by the weak interaction.

Are there any numbers available on how neutrino masses run up to the Planck energy?
(Assuming, of course, that the standard model is valid throughout, i.e., no susy, no technicolor, etc.) Are the renormalization equations as simple as for QED? Are there any books/papers on the issue?

Thank you for any hint!

François
 

1. What is the relationship between electron mass and energy?

The electron mass is a fundamental property of an electron and is constant. However, according to the theory of relativity, the mass of an electron can appear to increase as its energy increases.

2. Does the electron mass increase or decrease as its energy increases?

As an electron's energy increases, its mass appears to increase according to the theory of relativity. This is known as "mass running with energy."

3. How does the electron mass change with energy at high speeds?

At high speeds, the mass of an electron increases significantly due to the effects of relativity. This is why particles with high energies are often referred to as "relativistic."

4. Can the mass of an electron become infinite at high energies?

No, the mass of an electron cannot become infinite at any energy. According to the theory of relativity, the mass of an electron can approach infinity as its energy approaches the speed of light, but it will never actually reach infinity.

5. Is there a limit to how much the electron mass can increase with energy?

Yes, there is a limit to how much the mass of an electron can increase with energy. This limit is known as the "rest mass energy," which is the energy equivalent of an electron's rest mass. As an electron's energy approaches this limit, its mass increase will also approach infinity.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
682
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
801
Back
Top