How does the electrostatic potential at point B compare to point A?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the electrostatic potential at two points, A and B, relative to a charged sphere. At point A, the potential is calculated using the formula V=kQ/r, while at point B, it is V=kQ/(2r). Participants debate whether the potential at B is smaller, the same, or greater than at A, with the consensus leaning towards it being the same due to the nature of electric potential being independent of the test charge. The confusion arises from the additional information about the test charges, but ultimately, the electric potential from the sphere remains constant at different distances. Clarification is sought on the interpretation of the problem, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the source charge rather than the test charge.
LonghornDude8
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A test charge +q is brought to a point A a distance r from the center of a sphere having a net charge +Q. Next, a test charge +2q is brought to a point B a distance 2r from the center of the sphere.
Compared with the electrostatic potential at A, the electrostatic potential at B is
A. smaller
B. the same
C. greater


Homework Equations


V=kq/r
U=kq1q2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Because you are solving for electric potential I assume that you forget about the charge of the test charges and therefore you would get A. smaller. But if you use the charge of the test charges, you get b. the same. I'm just looking for someone to agree or disagree with me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LonghornDude8 said:
Because you are solving for electric potential I assume that you forget about the charge of the test charges and therefore you would get A. smaller.
I agree.
But if you use the charge of the test charges, you get b. the same. I'm just looking for someone to agree or disagree with me
I disagree. As you said, the electric potential set up by the charged sphere is the same at all points in space regardless of how much additional charge you bring in.
 
Ya, what I said first was right. I just got a little confused because they gave extra info... I hate when that happens.

"I know one thing - that I know no thing." - lol, paradox
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top