How Does the Finite Size of the Nucleus Affect Hydrogen's Ground State Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andyfreesty1e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
andyfreesty1e
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find an expression for the correction to the energy of the ground state of the hydrogen atom due to the finite size of the nucleus. Treat the nuclear charge as a thin shell of radius r0.

what i have been thinking is that you the size of the nucleus as a perturbation, but i don't know where to go from here.

Just really looking for a step in the right direction
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There will be a shift in the potential energy resulting from the difference between the point charge (presumably this is what your model previously assumed) and the shell charge distribution.

Another hint:

The energy shift will be <psi*(r)|delta V |psi(r)>

And another:

The difference in potential is only really significant over a range of r much less than the Bohr radius, so the wavefunctions are essentially constant and can be taken outside the integral. Don't forget the 4pi r^2 in the integral over space.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top