How Does the Ideal Gas Theory Account for Volume and Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The ideal gas theory assumes that gas particles have negligible volume and no intermolecular forces, which simplifies calculations. However, when considering one mole of gas at standard temperature and pressure (STP), it occupies approximately 22.4 liters, leading to confusion about the concept of volume. The theory refers to the volume of individual gas particles being negligible compared to the container's volume, not the bulk gas itself. While the approximation of 22.4 liters holds for ideal gases, real gases exhibit slight deviations due to particle volume and intermolecular forces. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the relationship between mass, volume, and the behavior of gases under ideal conditions.
wanderlust44
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This might be a stupid question, but I am confused about the ideal gas theory. I know that we assume high temperatures and low pressures, and that the volume is negligible when we compare it to a container, but my textbook is very confusing about this point.

It says assume zero/negligible volume and mass, but then goes on to calculate 1 mol of any gas at STP is 22.4L. Also, it says that the conditions of ideal gas do assume that there is no volume or IMF, but that it would have some mass. How can it have no volume and a 22.4L volume (and no mass)? I think I need clarification with regards to what it is talking about. Is it talking about the particles?

Also, if we look at the graph of pressure and temperature, wouldn't negligible volume mean 0K rather than 273.15K? Thanks for the clarification.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Could the text be saying, assume zero/negligible *change* in mass and volume?
 
It would be better for us to provide direct quotes from your text on this point. All we are doing now is playing a game of Telephone.
 
No volume refers to the volume taken up by a specific atom of gas, not the bulk gas as a whole. The 22.4L of 1mol at 1bar pressure is only an approximation and does not hold for real gases, in reality the small/light monatomic gases are close to 22.4L but not exactly there. The discrepancy lies in the fact that each particle of gas does in fact take up some volume and that there are slight intermolecular forces.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top