How does the placement of a lens behind a slit affect the diffraction pattern?

AI Thread Summary
Adding a lens behind a slit significantly alters the diffraction pattern based on its focal length and placement. A diverging lens increases the spread of the diffraction pattern, while a converging lens has varying effects depending on its position relative to the slit. If the lens is at the focal point, light travels parallel, resulting in the first minimum being closer to the center. When placed more than one focal length away, the light converges, altering the pattern. Conversely, positioning the lens less than a focal length from the slit reduces the spreading of the pattern.
imagemania
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How does adding a lens behind a slit alter the diffraction pattern given you know it's focal length?

Homework Equations



I know currently that i'd look at equations such as:
y_{n} = \frac{nD\lambda}{d}
Destructive and so fourth

But what about the lens, does that come into the equations anywhere?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
imagemania said:

Homework Statement


How does adding a lens behind a slit alter the diffraction pattern given you know it's focal length?

Homework Equations



I know currently that i'd look at equations such as:
y_{n} = \frac{nD\lambda}{d}
Destructive and so fourth

But what about the lens, does that come into the equations anywhere?

Thanks!

The way I see it, after the light passes througgh the slit, we have it spreading out - to ultimately show a pattern spread on the wall.

If we use a diverging lens, the pattern will be spread out even more.

With a converging lens, it depends where we place the lens.

If the slit is at the focal point, then the spreading light will then travel parallel, so the first minimum would be closer to the centre.
If the lens is placed more than one focal length away, the light will be coming back together.

If the lens is placed less than a focal length from the slits, the spreading will be reduced.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top