How Does the Residue Theorem Help in Analyzing Plane Wave Interference?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the residue theorem to analyze the interference of plane waves represented by a specific integral involving wave amplitudes. The integral includes a delta function that constrains the frequency, prompting questions about the integration limits and the potential need for a Fourier transform. Participants express confusion regarding the interpretation of the delta function in the context of the integral. There is a suggestion to tackle the integral over frequency first to simplify the analysis. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on applying the residue theorem effectively in this scenario.
AwesomeTrains
Messages
115
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I have to show that the interference of plane waves: f^{(\pm)}(\vec r,t)=\int \frac {d^3k}{(2\pi)^{3/2}}\int \frac {d\omega}{(2\pi)^{1/2}}e^{i(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t)}\tilde f^{(\pm)}(\vec k, \omega)

where the amplitudes are given as: \tilde f^{(\pm)}(\vec k, \omega)=\frac {2\delta(\omega-\omega_0)}{k^2-(\omega\pm i\delta)^2/c^2}
is a spherical wave of the form: f^{(\pm)}(\vec r, t)=\frac{1}{r}e^{-i\omega_0(t\mp r/c)}

Homework Equations


They recommend that I use the residue theorem.

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought about doing some sort of coordinate transformation.
What are the integration limits? They weren't given, do I have to figure those out?
Would it be useful to do a Fourier transform of the amplitudes?

Any tips to get me started are really appreciated. (I get confused when I look at the integral)

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thought about it. I guess I should do the integral over d\omega first, but what is the meaning of this \delta in (ω±iδ)^2/c^2 I know that it's the delta function when it has some argument but there it hasn't.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top