How Does the Rule of Signs Prove Inequalities in Ordered Rings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fk378
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In an ordered ring, show that
If a>0, b>0, then a>b <--> (a^2)>(b^2).

Hint: [(b^2)-(a^2)] = (b-a)(b+a). Use Rule of Signs.


Homework Equations


Rule of Signs?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to use the hint and I'm having trouble with the proof, as this is my first proofs class.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since we know that both a and b must be positive value
Therefore, if we take square root on both side of equation (a^2) > (b^2).
it would make a > b always. Would this work?
 
Are you asking me? That looks like it would work for me but I don't know if it is sufficient enough in "proof language."

Also, the hint isn't being used in your answer...
 
Because this is "if and only if" you need to show two things:

1) If a> b then a2> b2. Since this is an ordered ring, the fact that a> b and a> 0 tells you that a*a> a*b (why?); now do the same with a> b and b> 0.

2) if a2> b2 then a> b. Okay, a2> b2 tells you that (a+ b)(a-b)> 0. What do the "signs" of a+ b and a- b have to be? I put "signs" in quotes because you cannot just assume facts from real numbers. You are working in an arbitrary ordered ring and you have to use the axioms and definitions for an order ring. In particular, a is "positive" if and only if a> 0. Since you are given that a> 0 and b>0, can you show that a+b> 0? What does that tell you about a- b?
 
fk378 said:

Homework Statement


In an ordered ring, show that
If a>0, b>0, then a>b <--> (a^2)>(b^2).

Hint: [(b^2)-(a^2)] = (b-a)(b+a). Use Rule of Signs.


Homework Equations


Rule of Signs?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to use the hint and I'm having trouble with the proof, as this is my first proofs class.

I think the 'rule of signs' just means positive*negative=negative. (b-a)<0 and (b+a)>0. So (b-a)*(b+a)<0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top