How Does the Sagnac Effect Cause Interference Patterns in a Rotating System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter n0_3sc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    sagnac
n0_3sc
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
I'm having trouble understanding the Sagnac Effect.
So far all I know is that a ring cavity is formed where 2 beams travel in opposite directions. My question is:
Why do the 2 beams form an interference pattern if the entire cavity is rotating at some angular velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is easier to see when you have an external light source, in which case, even thinking non-relativistically, you can see that the beams traveling in opposite directions travel through different path lengths before meeting at the detector. (This is similar to what Michelson and Morley were hoping to see).

For the case where the source is also part of the rotating setup, this requires a more careful explanation. It might be better to just refer you to a good source. I can't think of one at the moment, but I will, in a bit.
 
if you had an external light source, is this rotating as well? if not wouldn't that mean that all the mirrors in the cavity would have to be beam splitters?
Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top