How Does the Time Evolution of Expectation Shape Scientific Understanding?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time evolution of quantum mechanical expectation values, specifically focusing on the expectation value of the operator \(x^2\) and its relationship to momentum operators in a three-dimensional wave packet context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the Ehrenfest theorem and its implications for the time derivative of expectation values. There is an attempt to derive a specific relationship involving \(\), \(\), and \(\). Questions arise regarding the presence of an extra term in the calculations and its significance.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the derivation process and identify potential errors. One participant expresses confusion about an additional term that appears in their calculations, while another participant indicates they have resolved their issue with the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of quantum mechanics and are discussing the implications of differential equations related to expectation values. The discussion reflects a focus on mathematical manipulation and the interpretation of results within the framework of quantum theory.

OGrowli
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking about how quantum mechanical expectation values evolve with time? If so, then it evolves according to the differential equation

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}<{\psi}|O|{\psi}> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<{\psi}|[H,O]|{\psi}> + <{\psi}|\frac{{\partial}O}{{\partial}t}|{\psi}>[/tex]

With O being a Hermitian operator.
 
Last edited:
planck42 said:
Are you asking about how quantum mechanical expectation values evolve with time? If so, then it evolves according to the differential equation

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}<{\psi}|O|{\psi}> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<{\psi}|[H,O]|{\psi}> + <{\psi}|\frac{{\partial}O}{{\partial}t}|{\psi}>[/tex]

With O being a Hermitian operator.

i don't know what happened to my original post, but I am having an issue with the following problem:

Show that:

\frac{d}{dt}<x^2> =\frac{1}{m}(< xp_x> +<p_xx>)

for a three dimensional wave packet.

relevant equations:

Ehrenfest Theorem:(1)
[tex]i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}<O>=<[O,H]>+i\hbar<\frac{\partial }{\partial t}O>[/tex]

where O is an operator
(2)
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*O\psi[/tex]

I tried using both ways illustrated above and I arrived at the same answer:

[tex]\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[\bigtriangledown ^2(x^2\psi)-x^2\bigtriangledown ^2\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[\frac{\partial }{\partial x}<br /> (x^2\psi'+2x\psi)-x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[<br /> 2\psi+2x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\psi+2x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\psi+(x^2-x^2)\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{m}\int_{V}d^3r[\psi ^*(-i\hbar)\psi+\psi^*x(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})\psi+\psi^*(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})x\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{m}(<xp_x>+<p_xx>)-\frac{i\hbar}{m}[/tex]

Am I doing anything wrong? Where does the extra term come from, and does it mean anything?
 
nvm, I got it:

[tex] =\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[\frac{\partial }{\partial x}<br /> (x^2\psi'+2x\psi)-x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{-i\hbar}{2m}\int_{V}d^3r\psi ^*[x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi+2x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\psi+2\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(x\psi)-x^2\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial x^2}\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{m}\int_{V}d^3r[\psi^*x(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})\psi+\psi^*(-i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial x})x\psi][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{m}(<xp_x>+<p_xx>)[/tex]

I went wrong thinking I could just rearrange the derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
536
Replies
32
Views
16K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K