Why Does the Central Carbon Have a Positive Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of carbocations, specifically why a central carbon can have a positive charge despite not filling its octet. It highlights that these carbocations are unstable yet serve as transient intermediates in various organic reactions, particularly in unimolecular nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of resonance structures in understanding the stability and reactivity of these intermediates. Participants suggest that multiple resonance structures can be drawn, but not all contribute equally to the molecule's true nature. Ultimately, the focus is on identifying the most stable resonance structures for the given carbocation.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
I was looking at this problem. It says I should write appropriate resonance structures. But, even with resonance, I do not see how a carbon cannot fill its octet. Why does the carbon in the middle have a positive charge. Is that not unstable?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-28 at 11.12.30 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-28 at 11.12.30 AM.png
    1,018 bytes · Views: 471
Physics news on Phys.org
The structure you have drawn is known as a carbocation. Although these structures are indeed very unstable, they are often transient intermediates in many reactions, and understanding their resonance structures can aid in understanding how these intermediates react in various organic reaction mechanisms (e.g. in unimolecular nucleophilic substitution and unimolecular elimination reactions.)
 
See: Allylic Carbocation.

In your case it is "doubly allylic" so you should have several resonance structures available. Can you draw them now?
 
I could find three! If you could confirm me the number that would be great! If they are wrong, I am fully ready to draw them out fully.
 
Well, you could technically draw many more resonance structure than simply three. It doesn't mean that all of them will be contributors to the true nature of the actual molecule though. I guess for the typical O-chem question where there it is implied that the most stable resonance structures should be drawn, then the answer is the first structure you posted and two more. So three total. You can post a picture for us to double check that you are doing it properly.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top