How Does Time Between Depositions Affect Cohesion of Au Layers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Si14
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cohesion between two layers of gold (Au) deposited via e-beam evaporation in vacuum can be compromised by the presence of hydrocarbon contamination that forms after venting the chamber. Even though gold is considered inert, a layer of hydrocarbons can adsorb on the surface, affecting the bonding between the layers. To ensure better adhesion of the second layer, it is advisable to perform sputter cleaning in a vacuum before deposition, as simple cleaning methods may not effectively remove this contamination. Relying on the inert nature of gold without addressing potential surface contamination can lead to poor adhesion, as evidenced by issues with the tape test after deposition.
Si14
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I have deposited about 200nm of Au and I am going to deposit another 200nm layer of Au on top of this layer. All deposition are with e-beam evaporation and are done in vacuum. I have two questions:

1- Do you know how the cohesion between these two layers is?
2- I am going to deposit the second (top) layer of Au, two or three weeks after depositing the first layer. Should I do any cleaning before depositing the second layer? I, personally, think it is not necessary, since Au is an inert material and there shouldn't be any layer formed on top of that, right?

Thank you very much.
Regards.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I have tried this and the second layer doesn't stick well enough to pass the tape test. As soon as you vent the chamber after the first deposition, a layer of hydrocarbons will adsorb upon it and will interfere (to some extent) with the bonding between the two layers. This layer can't be removed except by sputter cleaning in a vacuum.

It's still worth a shot to try, but the line of thinking that a material will remain perfectly clean as long as it's inert is off base.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top