How Does Voltage Relate to Resistance and Power Dissipation?

AI Thread Summary
Voltage is defined as the potential difference across a conductor when a current of one ampere dissipates one watt of power, as noted in the discussion. Resistance directly affects power dissipation; for example, increasing resistance in a circuit reduces current and, consequently, power dissipation, even if voltage remains constant. A circuit with a 7-volt battery and varying resistance illustrates this principle, showing how power changes with current and resistance adjustments. The relationship between voltage, current, and resistance is encapsulated in Ohm's law, emphasizing that while voltage can remain the same, the current and power dissipation will vary based on resistance. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping electrical principles and their practical applications.
Mr_Bojingles
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Wikipedia defines the volt as "The volt is defined as the potential difference across a conductor when a current of one ampere dissipates one watt of power."

Doesn't resistance always determine the dissipation of power? If you were to have a superconductor with no resistance then the current would flow but no energy would be dissipated. Does that mean there's no voltage even one terminal is charged differently to the other?

I don't understand how dissipation of energy comes into the definition of the volt seeing as the dissipation of energy would vary depending on the resistance of the conductor while the potential difference between the two points would remain the same.

If I had a circuit with a 7 volt battery. The resistance of the circuit is 1 ohm. There is a current of 7 amps flowing throughout the circuit which is dissipating 7 watts. Let's say I raise the resistance of the circuit to 2 ohms so there is a current of 3.5 amps flowing. Would this circuit still dissipate 7 amps due to the increased resistance?

Anyhow in this case I changed the amount of amps but the voltage remained the same. If a volt is defined as the potential difference when 1 amp dissipates 1 watt how can the voltage remain the same when I alter the current due to resistance?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Mr_Bojingles said:
If I had a circuit with a 7 volt battery. The resistance of the circuit is 1 ohm. There is a current of 7 amps flowing throughout the circuit which is dissipating 7 watts. Let's say I raise the resistance of the circuit to 2 ohms so there is a current of 3.5 amps flowing. Would this circuit still dissipate 7 amps due to the increased resistance?

Ok firstly, in the series circuit you describe we would have
P=IV=7A*7V = 49Watts of power being dissipated

If you double the resistance, and the voltage remains at 7V, then sure, there would be 3.5A of current.
This of course means that less power is being dissipated,
P=IV=24.5Watts.


The power loss increases as the square of the current (Power can be re-written as P = I^2R) - which is why we have transmission lines in the hundreds of kV :smile:


From the wikipedia article on 'Volt':
Definition
The volt is defined as the potential difference across a conductor when a current of one ampere dissipates one watt of power.

This is just basically saying Ohm's law
In case one above, we had 7Amps dissipating into 49Watts.
If we want one 'Wikipedia Volt' to be when one Amp dissipates to one Watt, we'd need 7 of these Volts to dissipate 7 Amps into 49 Watts
 
de volt is simular to de pressure. I like to keep it simple.
 
Last edited:
Mr_Bojingles said:
Wikipedia defines the volt as "The volt is defined as the potential difference across a conductor when a current of one ampere dissipates one watt of power."

Doesn't resistance always determine the dissipation of power? If you were to have a superconductor with no resistance then the current would flow but no energy would be dissipated. Does that mean there's no voltage even one terminal is charged differently to the other?

I don't understand how dissipation of energy comes into the definition of the volt seeing as the dissipation of energy would vary depending on the resistance of the conductor while the potential difference between the two points would remain the same.

If I had a circuit with a 7 volt battery. The resistance of the circuit is 1 ohm. There is a current of 7 amps flowing throughout the circuit which is dissipating 7 watts. Let's say I raise the resistance of the circuit to 2 ohms so there is a current of 3.5 amps flowing. Would this circuit still dissipate 7 amps due to the increased resistance?

Anyhow in this case I changed the amount of amps but the voltage remained the same. If a volt is defined as the potential difference when 1 amp dissipates 1 watt how can the voltage remain the same when I alter the current due to resistance?
Using power = voltage * current (assuming DC), is one way of looking at it.

1 Volt = 1 J/C (joule/coulomb), i.e. a potential difference of 1 V would induce a change in energy of 1 Joule on 1 Coulomb of charge.

1 eV (electron volt) indicates the energy (1 eV or 1.602E-19 J) that a proton or electron would gain from passing across a potential of 1 volt.

And by all means, check out the Hyperphysics reference cited by stewartcs.
 
You know what i think. I think it is partly right that you are imagining the box and a person. Take a look at this: the resistance of air. When the engine is fired up, inside the engine will become a high pressure environment, whereareas the outside is a lower pressure environment than the inside of the engine. Therefore, it creates the opposite forces, and that's why when you see the afterburner of an aircraft is being fire, there are always a "skip" fire before it is fully being called "an afterburner". However, the thought of the fire pushes the inside of the engine is not wrong either. It is very logic that the fire burns every bit of particles of Oxygen just to make a leverage to be pushed away.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
Back
Top