How does weight add up to press on things?

  • Thread starter Thread starter avorobey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how solid objects exert pressure on each other at a microscopic level. When one block of iron is placed on another, the pressure felt is due to the weight of the upper block being transmitted through the lower block, not directly from gravity. This pressure is defined as force per area, which explains why the material composition (iron or wood) does not change the pressure exerted. The interaction at the atomic level involves electromagnetic forces, where repulsion between electrons in the atoms creates the pressure. Ultimately, the mechanics of pressure in solids parallels those in gases, with atomic interactions playing a crucial role.
avorobey
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I think I understand how pressure works with gases. More molecules bouncing around -> more random impacts -> stronger force.

But I realized to my embarrassment that I don't understand how solid things press on each other, microscopically. Say I put a block of iron on my head. If I put another one on top of it, I feel twice the weight. The two blocks together can tear through thin paper where one block can't. But the contact between my head (or paper) and the blocks is just a very thin layer of atoms of the lower block's structure. If the lower block doesn't move when I put the upper one on it, what causes this thin layer to "press" on my head (or paper) more? When the two blocks together tear through thin paper, where does the force come from that acts on the paper molecules - it can't be gravity from the upper block, right? And how come that whatever this source of pressure is only depends on the weight of the upper block, and not on what it's made out of, iron or wood?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
avorobey said:
I think I understand how pressure works with gases. More molecules bouncing around -> more random impacts -> stronger force.
To bounce they need some kind of repulsion, right?

avorobey said:
But I realized to my embarrassment that I don't understand how solid things press on each other, microscopically.
The atoms at the boundary also repel each-other.

avorobey said:
When the two blocks together tear through thin paper, where does the force come from that acts on the paper molecules - it can't be gravity from the upper block, right?
Not directly, but transmitted through the lower block

avorobey said:
And how come that whatever this source of pressure is only depends on the weight of the upper block, and not on what it's made out of, iron or wood?
Because that's how pressure is defined: force per area. And the force here depends on weight.
 
>Not directly, but transmitted through the lower block

What exactly does this mean, "transmitted"? Microscopically?
 
avorobey said:
>Not directly, but transmitted through the lower block

What exactly does this mean, "transmitted"? Microscopically?

Electromagnetic forces.
 
Atoms in a solid (or gas or liquid) have electrons on the outside. Like charges repel. Not really any difference between a solid, liquid or gas in that respect. It's why gas molecules bounce off the walls of a vessel rather than disappear into them.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top