How Does Wheel Radius Affect Rotational Kinetic Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how wheel radius affects rotational kinetic energy in experiments involving a mass attached to a string wound around wheels of different radii. It highlights that while angular velocity (ω) is independent of radius, the moment of inertia (I) and rotational kinetic energy (Krot) are influenced by the radius. The potential energy from the falling mass (mgh) is converted into kinetic energy, leading to a comparison of Krot for both wheel sizes. The conclusion suggests that the rotational kinetic energies may differ due to the varying radii affecting the moment of inertia. Understanding the relationship between radius, angular velocity, and energy conservation is crucial in determining the outcome of the experiments.
truho
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You attach a mass M to a string and wind the string around the circumference of a wheel. The wheel has two hubs with radii R1 and R2 with R2 > R1. You perform two experiments. First you wind the string around the smaller radius wheel and allow the mass to fall a distance h. In the second experiment you wind the string around the larger radius wheel and allow the mass to fall a distance h. Rank the rotational kinetic energy Krot of the wheel for each experiment.


Homework Equations



1/2I(ω^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Basically I was thinking that ω is independent of the radius so they would be equal
but then if I=m(r^2) and ω = v/r then
I(ω^2)=1/2m(r^2)(v^2/r^2) and the r's cancel out giving us rotational kinetic energy = 1/2mv
So would the rotational kinetic energies be equal or would 1 be larger than the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about energy conservation. Where does the energy come from to turn the wheel?
 
Wouldn't it have came from the potential energy mgh?
 
truho said:
Wouldn't it have came from the potential energy mgh?

Is that a guess? :devil:
 
haha alright, I think I got it, thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top