How Effective Is Inverting a Test Statistic for New Confidence Intervals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostyc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistic Test
AI Thread Summary
Inverting a test statistic is a powerful method for constructing confidence intervals for unknown parameters, particularly the mean of a normal distribution with known variance. The discussion focuses on demonstrating this method through the creation of standard one-sided and two-sided confidence intervals, as well as exploring the potential for developing a new type of confidence interval that differs from traditional approaches. Participants express a need for resources to better understand the concept, particularly regarding the "red" part of the method, with one suggesting it might relate to pivotal intervals. The conversation reflects a sense of urgency and frustration among users seeking clarity on the topic. Overall, the thread highlights the complexity of constructing innovative confidence intervals using hypothesis testing.
ghostyc
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A very powerful method of construction of a confidence interval/set for an unknown parameter, the mean of a normal distribution for example, is to invert a family of hypotheses tests about that parameter. This project is firstly to demonstrate the understanding of this method by using it to construct the usual one-sided and two-sided confidence intervals for the unknown mean of a normal distribution with a known variance. But the prize is given if a new confidence interval can be constructed by using this method for the unknown mean of a normal distribution with a known variance.

Here, `A new confidence interval' means a confidence interval that is
different from the usual one-sided and two-sided confidence intervals
for the unknown mean of a normal distribution with a known variance.


Hi,

Can someone kindly explain a bit on the 'red' part.
I have tried to search for it, but nothing much related seem to come out.
You may not tell me what it is, all I need is some related resource ( section in a book, or a website, or an article? )

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

I finally see something here.

Is there any possibility that the 'red' part is referering to the pivotal interval?

Thanks.

I am a bit desperate now.
 
slowly giving up on this one
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

Similar threads

Back
Top