I How energy of light is conserved when passing through medium

Gevorg
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The velocity of light changes when it passes through a medium of a different refractive index. So let's suppose the light is traveling through a vacuum at a velocity c and then passes through a glass wall. Its velocity decreases while traveling through it but then speeds back up to c after passing through it. How does this not violate conservation of energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy , in light in vacuum, only depends on inverse wavelenght (color of light), not in velocity. A light beam loss energy through the medium by absorption and by wavelength dilation when it goes out of the medium.
 
What's going on as light goes through a medium is very complicated. It's way beyond my expertise except in a general way.

What happens broadly is light actually becomes quasi particles (phonons I think - but don't hold me to it) while traveling through a medium then get converted back when exiting. The picture you find in beginning texts, or thinking intuitively about it ie it get's absorbed by atoms that go to a higher energy state then spontaneously emit and travel through that way and hence are slowed down is evidently wrong - and there is a simple reason it must be wrong but I can't recall it.

ZapperZ has written extensively on this eg
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/light-and-mediums.27359/

He, or someone with a similar level of knowledge of such things, is the right person to answer this question.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Iliody
bhobba said:
What happens broadly is light actually becomes quasi particles (phonons I think - but don't hold me to it) while traveling through a medium then get converted back when exiting.
It's polariton, which is a mixture of photon and polarization quanta. For a given wavelength polaritons have two modes of oscillation, where typically one mode is more like photon and the other is more like phonon.

It's indeed a bit complicated, but there is a simplified answer to the OP's question. The energy of the "photon" (where the quotes denote that it is really the photon-like polariton in the medium) is
$$E=\hbar\omega$$
and the frequency ##\omega## does not change by entering or leaving the medium. The dispersion relation ##\omega(k)## depends on the medium, which means that ##k## (and hence the wavelength) depends on the medium while ##\omega## itself does not depend on the medium.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top