How exactly is information for CO transitions found?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
AI Thread Summary
Telescopes can focus on distant molecular clouds by precisely targeting them, often using techniques like metal masks to isolate the light from the object of interest. Data from these observations is compared with other regions and historical data to ensure accuracy and confidence in the source. Spectroscopy allows astronomers to measure the intensity of emitted light at various wavelengths, which helps in identifying specific CO transitions. Graphs representing temperature versus velocity for these transitions are constructed based on established physical principles and observations of nearby objects. This method builds on a long history of astronomical observations to validate findings.
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I recently attended a talk about molecular clouds discussing CO transitions in them. I've been trying to understand spectroscopy in astronomy and have tried reading lots of articles online although I still don't quite get everything. It seems that telescopes can find the intensity emitted by certain sources at different wavelengths, such as in normal spectroscopy, correct? How exactly then can a telescope focus on one particular molecular cloud light years away without having this data obfuscated by all the other interacting objects and interfering waves in space? How are we confident this information came from that particular molecular cloud specifically (is it some sort of filter done against the background? If so, could you explain this)? Also, I saw a temperature vs velocity graph that displayed different CO transitions, but how can such a graph even be constructed?

I unfortunately don't have the slides for reference, but I'm just fascinated and slightly confused by how we actually get all this data from telescopes. Any information you have would be great!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I recently attended a talk about molecular clouds discussing CO transitions in them. I've been trying to understand spectroscopy in astronomy and have tried reading lots of articles online although I still don't quite get everything. It seems that telescopes can find the intensity emitted by certain sources at different wavelengths, such as in normal spectroscopy, correct?
Yes.
How exactly then can a telescope focus on one particular molecular cloud light years away without having this data obfuscated by all the other interacting objects and interfering waves in space?
You point the telescope precisely at the object you want to study - you can collect light from it the same way you get light from nearby objects without getting confused about other things in the way. One way is to put a metal mask over the telescope that has a small hole in it, and the aim of the telescope through the hole is allowed to pass over the disk of the star or the area of the cloud being studied - the way the data collected changes with the pass is graphed.
But mainly, if there is something in the way we can see it's effect ... it will block some of the light from what we want to look at.

How are we confident this information came from that particular molecular cloud specifically (is it some sort of filter done against the background?
Very confident. The data from the regeon of the cloud is compared with data from another region and also from other times.
If so, could you explain this)? Also, I saw a temperature vs velocity graph that displayed different CO transitions, but how can such a graph even be constructed?
By using our understanding of how these things usually work for nearby objects and assuming that physics is the same everywhere.

Note: Galileo demonstrated his telescope first by pointing it at objects across the room - so people could verify quickly that the telescope showed what was really there. Then he pointed it at more and more distant objects, like the motto carved high up on a building across town (which people knew about)... he did this well before showing them other planets because he needed to build confidence in the telescope.

It is the same today - observations are not done alone but are built on a long history of other observations and refinements.
 
  • Like
Likes TheCanadian
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top