How Far Apart Are Two -5.00 C Charges with a 4000 N Repulsive Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kennedy111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance between two -5.00 C charges experiencing a 4000 N repulsive force using the equation Fe = kq1q2/r^2. The solution derived shows that the distance r is approximately 7495.83 meters, or 7.50 x 10^3 m when rounded to three significant digits. Participants note the unusual magnitude of the charges, suggesting that typical electrostatics problems often use microcoulombs (μC) instead. This raises concerns about the practicality of such high charge values, as even at this distance, the force remains significant. The conversation highlights the importance of unit selection in electrostatics calculations.
Kennedy111
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the distance between two charges of -5.00 C each if the force of electrostatic repulsion acting on them is 4.00 x 10^3 N?

q1 = -5.00 C
q2 = -5.00 C
Fe = 4.00 x 10^3
k = 8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2

Homework Equations



Fe = kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I rearranged the equation above and got:

r = (sqrt) kq1q2/Fe

r = (sqrt) (8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(5.00 C)(5.00 C) / (4.00 x 10^3 N)
= 7495.832175 m

To three significant digits my answer would be 7.50 x 10^ 3 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kennedy111,

Kennedy111 said:

Homework Statement


What is the distance between two charges of -5.00 C each if the force of electrostatic repulsion acting on them is 4.00 x 10^3 N?

q1 = -5.00 C
q2 = -5.00 C
Fe = 4.00 x 10^3
k = 8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2

Homework Equations



Fe = kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I rearranged the equation above and got:

r = (sqrt) kq1q2/Fe

r = (sqrt) (8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(5.00 C)(5.00 C) / (4.00 x 10^3 N)
= 7495.832175 m

To three significant digits my answer would be 7.50 x 10^ 3 m
Your math and approach look fine to me. :approve:

But just for the sake of practicality, you might wish to double check that you're using the correct units from the beginning. Five Coulombs (whether negative or positive) is a lot of charge. Most charges in electrostatics problems I'm used to use units of μC.

I'm just sayin', in the system you're modeling, as you've expressed it, there is still a four kilo-Newton force between the charges, even after separating them by seven and a half kilometers (several miles). That's a lot of charge!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top