How far does an airliner wheel slip before rolling without slipping?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance an airliner wheel slips before rolling without slipping upon landing. Initial calculations led to a distance of 0.772 m, but the expected answer is 1.6 m. The confusion arises from misunderstanding the relationship between the wheel's angular displacement and the airliner's displacement. The correct approach requires considering the tangential distance traveled by the wheel in relation to the overall movement of the airliner. Clarification on this point is crucial for accurate problem-solving.
bowma166
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When the wheels of a landing airliner tough the runway, they are not rotating initially. The wheels first slide on the runway (and produc eclouds of smoke and burn marks on the runway, which you may have noticed), until the sliding friction force has accelerated the wheels to the rotational speed required for rolling without slipping. From the following data, calculate how far the wheel of an airliner slips before it begins to roll without slipping: the wheel has a radius of 0.60 m and a mass of 160 kg, the normal force acting on the wheel is 2.0 x 105 N, the speed of the airliner is 200 km/h, and the coefficient of sliding friction for the wheel on the runway is 0.80. Treat the wheel as a uniform disk.

Homework Equations


\vec{\tau}=\vec{F}\times\vec{R}

|\tau|=I\alpha

F_{friction}=\mu_{k}N

I_{disk}=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}

a=\alpha R

v^{2}=v_{0}^{2}+2ax

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, it's a wheel with a force applied at one point that creates a torque up to a certain acceleration. So... I started with \tau=RF=I\alpha, substituted in for I, alpha, and F, and solved for a:
R\mu_{k}N=\left(\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}\right)\left(\frac{a}{R}\right)

\mu_{k}N=\frac{1}{2}Ma

\frac{2\mu_{k}N}{M}=a

I then substituted that value of a into the v2=whatever kinematics equation:

v^{2}=v_{0}^{2}+2\left(\frac{2\mu_{k}N}{M}\right)x

x=\frac{Mv^{2}}{4\mu_{k}N}

Plugging in the given values, I get x = .772 m. The book says that the answer is 1.6 m. What am I doing wrong? It is kind of weird that they give you R but I didn't have to use it.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have any ideas? (Sorry for bumping so early like this but I need to sleep soon and I've got a test tomorrow. Heh.)
 
You're confusing angular displacement of a point on the wheel and the displacement of the airliner. The 'x' you solved for, therefore, is the tangential distance traveled by a point on the wheel, nothing to do with how far the airliner itself moves.
 
Oh, whoops. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top