Dick is right on all points here.
Dick said:
i) you are paying absolutely no attention to units.
Vipul said:
The denominator on the right-hand side should be 0.01*9.80665 m/s^2 here, not just 0.01. That 0.01 is a unitless scale factor.
Vipul said:
r^2 = (6.67x10^-11 x 5.974x10^24) / 0.01
If you had paid attention to units you would have been able to see that this expression is invalid. With units (but keeping that scale factor unitless), the expression becomes
r^2 = 6.673*10^{-11} \mathrm{m}^3/\mathrm{s}^2/\mathrm{kg}<br />
* 5.9742*10^{24} \mathrm{kg}/0.01
The expression on the left-hand side has dimensions length squared. The expression on the right-hand side has units m^3/s^2, which does not jibe with length squared. The culprit is that naked scale factor. It should be paired with Earth standard gravitational acceleration:
r^2 = 6.673*10^{-11} \mathrm{m}^3/\mathrm{s}^2/\mathrm{kg}<br />
* 5.9742*10^{24} \mathrm{kg}/<br />
(0.01*9.80665 \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2)
Now the right-hand side has units of square meters, matching the dimensions of the left-hand side.
Carrying this through yields r=63760km. This is the distance from the center of the Earth, not the surface of the Earth. You need to subtract the radius of the Earth, 6378km, to get the answer to the question.
Dick said:
ii) I think the answer you have been given is also quite wrong. What you want is 0.01*GM/(r_earth^2)=GM/r^2. That means r=10*r_earth. How far above the Earth you have to be is a somewhat different question but that's 10*r_earth-r_earth=9*r_earth.
This is a much easier way to arrive at the result. 10r=63780km to four decimal places, which differs from the more convoluted result by 20 km.
Dick said:
I don't know where this 1.93*10^5 km is coming from. Sorry.
The 1.93*10^5 km answer is simply wrong.