How far will a pullback car go? Spring and friction coefficients.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a pullback toy car and seeks to determine how far it will travel before stopping, considering factors such as spring force and friction. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, specifically relating to forces, motion, and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore methods to determine the coefficient of friction using a ramp and question the validity of pulling the car back while measuring the angle of inclination. There is also discussion on the relevance of rolling versus sliding friction based on the car's motion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the setup. Suggestions for experimental approaches are being discussed, particularly regarding the measurement of friction and spring coefficients.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints such as the inability to disassemble the toy for direct measurement of the spring constant. Participants are also navigating the implications of different types of friction based on the car's movement.

Totally
Messages
26
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A pullback toy car is pulled back. How far will it go before it stops?

x(0)=0
v(0)=0
a(x<x0)=-k(x0-x)
a(x>x0)=μg
v(tf)=0
tf=D

Homework Equations



Fs=-kx
F=mg
Ff=μF

The Attempt at a Solution





d2x/dt2=1/m(k(x0-x)-μmg)

Later in the run spring constant is irrelevant, so
d2/dt2=1/m(-μmg)



I think I can figure out the μ by pulling the car back on the ramp and lowering the angle between the ramp and the surface until car starts rolling. Then the tangent of that angle tanθ=μ

Would this be correct? Also, what experiment or method would you propose to figure out the coefficient of spring? Disassembling the toy is not an option.

I apologize I didn't put formulas the proper way, however I couldn't get Latex to work even though I followed FAQ instructions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is assuming you are letting the car go down the ramp and are slowly increasing the angle of inclination.

I believe that the use of a ramp is correct in finding the coefficient of friction but it should be done without puling back the car. If it were pulled back, the spring force may easily overcome the frictional force at a smaller angle and the reading would be incorrect.
 
Is the car sliding on the horizontal surface? If it has rolling wheels then the coefficient of static or kinetic friction becomes irrelevant and rolling friction and air resistance will be the retarding forces. If it is sliding and air resistance is negligible, we can consider kinetic friction and work energy rule will give the results easily.
 
Sunil Simha said:
This is assuming you are letting the car go down the ramp and are slowly increasing the angle of inclination.

I believe that the use of a ramp is correct in finding the coefficient of friction but it should be done without puling back the car. If it were pulled back, the spring force may easily overcome the frictional force at a smaller angle and the reading would be incorrect.

I guess I wasn't clear enough, I was thinking about pulling the car back at the lower end of the plane and lowering the angle until it can climb the ramp.

mukundpa said:
Is the car sliding on the horizontal surface? If it has rolling wheels then the coefficient of static or kinetic friction becomes irrelevant and rolling friction and air resistance will be the retarding forces. If it is sliding and air resistance is negligible, we can consider kinetic friction and work energy rule will give the results easily.

Interesting approach, thanks for the idea! And yes, the toy is being pulled back on the horizontal surface. Do you have any ideas how to figure out the spring coefficient?
 

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
18K