How Fast is an Object When Its Mass Triples?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of an object whose mass is three times its rest mass using relativistic physics. The proposed formula for velocity incorporates the object's relativistic mass and its rest mass, emphasizing the need for absolute values in the calculations. It is confirmed that the correct velocity for an object with a relativistic mass three times greater than its rest mass is two-thirds the speed of light. The conversation also highlights the importance of algebraic accuracy in deriving these results. Ultimately, the speed of the object is determined to be v = (2/3)c.
DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
DaVinci said:
What is the speed of an objects whose mass is three times its rest mass.
I had some trouble with this question, but I would like to know if for these type of questions, is it safe to say that the velocity of a particle/object is equal to:

v=\sqrt{\mid\frac{{m_0}^2}{{X_{m_0}}^2}-1\mid c^2

Where X is equal to how many times larger it's relativistic mass is compared to it's rest mass.

? just curious... :rolleyes:

PS: \mid represents absolute value, but I think it would also work if:

v=\sqrt {-(\frac{{m_0}^2}{{X_{m_0}}^2}-1)c^2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you do not have a relativity problem, you have an algebra problem... check your algebra

m=m_0 / sqrt (1-(v/c)^2)
v=sqrt(1-(m_o/m)^2)c
 


Yes, your formula is correct for calculating the velocity of an object with a relativistic mass that is X times larger than its rest mass. The absolute value is necessary because the square root cannot take a negative value. So for an object with a relativistic mass that is three times its rest mass, the velocity would be:

v=\sqrt{\mid\frac{{m_0}^2}{{3{m_0}}^2}-1\mid c^2} = \sqrt{\mid\frac{1}{9}-1\mid c^2} = \sqrt{\mid-\frac{8}{9}\mid c^2} = \frac{2}{3}c

So the speed of the object would be two-thirds the speed of light.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top