How fast must the astronaut's head be moving

  • Thread starter Thread starter dukebdx12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head
dukebdx12
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In this device, an arm 8.84g long rotates about one end in a horizontal plane, and the astronaut is strapped in at the other end. Suppose that he is aligned along the arm with his head at the outermost end. The maximum sustained acceleration to which humans are subjected in this machine is typically 12.5g

- How fast must the astronaut's head be moving to experience this maximum acceleration? m/s

- What is the difference between the acceleration of his head and feet if the astronaut is 2.00m tall? m/s^2

- How fast in rpm (rev/min) is the arm turning to produce the maximum sustained acceleration? 1/T= __rpm


Homework Equations


v^2/r ? something similar maybe


The Attempt at a Solution


i have probably attempted every set-up besdies the one that works. I have used the numbers in every different way to try and figure this out. I have tried 22 different ways and can not figure this out for my life
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before setting up your calculations, think for a minute what kind of physical setup this is and what they're doing. Describe it to yourself. Draw a little sketch.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top