How Fourier Expansion indicates the Amplitude w.r.t a certain frequency?

AI Thread Summary
To extract the amplitude of a sinusoid component from a continuous wave using Fourier Expansion, the integral F(ω) = ∫ f(t) e^{-jωt} dt is essential. The user attempted to calculate the amplitude at a specific frequency ω = ω₀ using a cosine function but encountered confusion with the results. They noted that the real part of their Fourier transform led to unexpected results when applying limits. The teacher clarified that the amplitude should be determined using the magnitude |F(ω)| instead of just the real part, complicating the calculation further. The user is seeking assistance to resolve these issues and better understand the Fourier Expansion process.
genxium
Messages
137
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I want to know how could I extract the amplitude(of the sinusoid component) of a random continuous wave w.r.t a certain frequency response? The teacher said the Fourier Expansion can do that but I'm really confused by the limits and integrals.


Homework Equations



F(\omega)=\int f(t) e^{-j \omega t} dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the very easy example and want to extract the amplitude where the frequency matches(say \omega = \omega_0). f(t)=A \cdot cos\omega_0t,\hat{f}(t)=A \cdot e^{j \omega_0 t},\hat{F}(\omega)=\int \hat{f}(t) \cdot e^{-j \omega t} dt, range (-\infty ,\infty), but it turned out to be Re\{ \hat{F}( \omega ) \}=A \cdot \frac{sin(\omega_0 - \omega ) (t_2-t_1)}{\omega_0 - \omega}, where t_2=\infty,t_1=-\infty , it's weird if I follow the basic operation of sin function, I got Re\{ \hat{F}( \omega ) \}=2 \cdot A \cdot \frac{sin(\omega_0 - \omega ) \infty}{\omega_0 - \omega}, and then although applying that lim \frac{sinx}{x} -> 1 while x->0, it's 2A, besides I don't even know if this's right.

I have no idea what happened...

Any help will be appreciated !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Terribly sorry that my teacher has corrected my mistakes, the Amplitude should be |F(\omega)| instead of Re \{ \hat{F}(\omega) \},but the calculation becomes even harder, I'm still trying on this question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top