Schools How has you chosen grad school affected your career path?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of selecting a top-notch college for post-graduate studies in Astrophysics. A key point raised is the critical role of choosing a supervisor, which can significantly influence career outcomes after graduation. Many participants emphasize that the supervisor's mentorship often outweighs the prestige of the institution itself. It is noted that some successful scientists may not be effective supervisors due to their large research groups, highlighting the complexity of the decision-making process. Additionally, the conversation stresses the importance of having a backup plan, as most graduates will likely find employment outside of academia, and factors like luck can heavily impact academic success. The original poster, who has just completed their first year in an undergraduate physics program, is considering transferring to a university with better connections to top graduate schools, although they have not felt hindered by their current institution's lack of ties.
Newtons Blue Dog
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Hey guys, just after some advice on the perceived importance of finding a top notch college to attend post-graduate studies. They field I have a passion for is Astrophysics (yes crazy hard to get a job I know) and I was wondering if anyone has any advice on choosing graduate schools and how that choice has positively or negatively affected their future career paths.

I have heard from a few people that the choice of supervisor can be a make or break factor into how your career immediately after grad school pans out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newtons Blue Dog said:
I have heard from a few people that the choice of supervisor can be a make or break factor into how your career immediately after grad school pans out.

Indeed, most of the time the choice of supervisor is going to be much more important than the school you go to. It is certainly also the case (at least there in the UK) that there are many example of successful scientists who are not great as supervisors (in some cases because they run large groups and don't have time to effectively supervise their students). Hence, there are many variables that come into this and I don't think there is a way to guarantee success..
Regardless of what you do you will need a backup plan, you should always remember that most students will eventually end up working outside of academia and luck plays a very large part in who has a "successful" academic career.
 
In February you were just about to start an undergraduate physics major. How far have you gotten in coursework, and how is it going, so far?
 
Yep that's right. Just finished first year and have done really well. So am in the position to change universities if there would be any advantage. My university doesn't have many good ties to top level grad schools. But that's not bothered me so far.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top