How High Does Block m1 Rise After an Elastic Collision with m2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sailsinthesun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Magnets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height that block m1 reaches after an elastic collision with block m2 on a frictionless track. The problem involves two blocks, m1 and m2, with specific masses and a magnetic repulsion preventing them from touching. Key concepts include the conservation of energy and momentum, as both kinetic energy and momentum are conserved during elastic collisions. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in solving the problem. The overall approach suggests starting with conservation laws to simplify the calculations.
sailsinthesun
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks are free to slide along a frictionless wooden track ABC as shown in Figure P9.20. The block of mass m1 = 5.02 kg is released from A. Protruding from its front end is the north pole of a strong magnet, repelling the north pole of an identical magnet embedded in the back end of the block of mass m2 = 9.10 kg, initially at rest. The two blocks never touch. Calculate the maximum height to which m1 rises after the elastic collision.

http://www.webassign.net/pse/p9-26.gif



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start on this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation laws ring a bell?
 
Don't over complicate the problem. There is no friction, so all energy is conserved within the system. Think of the relationship between potential and kinetic energy and how they are converted into each other. Also, since there is an elastic collision, you need to use some momentum equations. Keep in mind that momentum and kinetic energy are both conserved in elastic collisions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top