How High Does the Stone Reach Above Point B?

AI Thread Summary
A stone is thrown vertically upward, passing point A with speed v and point B, 5.3 m higher, with speed v/2. The maximum height above point B is calculated using kinematic equations, leading to the conclusion that the height above B is 1.76 m. Adding this to the initial height of 5.3 m gives a total height of 7.06 m. The solution highlights the importance of careful attention to the problem's requirements.
~SPaRtaN~
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stone is thrown vertically upward. On its way up it passes point A with speed v, and point B, 5.3 m higher than A, with speed v/2. Calculate the maximum height reached by the stone above point B.


Homework Equations


v(final) = v(initial) + at
x(final) = x(initial) + v(initial)*t + 1/2 at^2
x(final) - x(initial) = 1/2 [v(final) - v(initial)]*t
2a[x(final) - x(initial)] = v(final)^2 - v(initial)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Vb^2 = Va^2 - 2 * g * Xab, where

Xab is given = 5.3 m
Va = V
Vb = V/2

(V^2) / 4 = V^2 - g * Xab

3/4 * V^2 = 2 * g * Xab

V^2 = 8/3 * 9.8 * 5.3 = 138.5 m^2/s^2
V = 11.77 m/s

Now use same equation between B-->C:

Vc^2 = Vb^2 - 2 * g * Xbc, where

Vc = 0
Vb = V / 2 = 11.77 / 2 = 5.88 m/s

solve for Xbc:

Xbc = Vb^2 / (2 * g)
Xbc = (5.88)^2 / (2 * 9.8)
Xbc = 1.76 m

So the height above point B is just

H = Xab + Xbc = 5.3 + 1.76 = 7.06 m



The above answer is not right...help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
~SPaRtaN~ said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Vb^2 = Va^2 - 2 * g * Xab, where

Xab is given = 5.3 m
Va = V
Vb = V/2

(V^2) / 4 = V^2 - g * Xab

3/4 * V^2 = 2 * g * Xab

V^2 = 8/3 * 9.8 * 5.3 = 138.5 m^2/s^2
V = 11.77 m/s

Now use same equation between B-->C:

Vc^2 = Vb^2 - 2 * g * Xbc, where

Vc = 0
Vb = V / 2 = 11.77 / 2 = 5.88 m/s

solve for Xbc:

Xbc = Vb^2 / (2 * g)
Xbc = (5.88)^2 / (2 * 9.8)
Xbc = 1.76 m

I believe that should be the answer since the question asks for the max height beyond point B.
 
^ Thanks...silly me, didn't paid attention on that part
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top