How high is the cliff and speed of arrow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Medgirl314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
An arrow is fired horizontally from a cliff at 280 ft/s and lands 400 feet away, prompting a calculation of the cliff's height. The time of flight is determined to be approximately 1.43 seconds using the formula t = x/v. The vertical height is calculated using the equation y = 1/2(a)(t^2), but confusion arises regarding the use of units, as acceleration due to gravity was initially used in meters per second squared instead of feet. After clarification, the correct height of the cliff is found to be approximately 32.9 feet, with a recommendation to round it to 33 feet. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent units in physics calculations.
Medgirl314
Messages
568
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



An arrow is fired horizontally off a cliff. The initial speed of the arrow is 280 ft/s and the arrow lands 400 feet from the base of the cliff. How high is the cliff?

Homework Equations


t=x/v
y=1/2(a)(t^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the horizontal component first.

xinitial=400
a=0
vinital=280 ft/s
x=vt
t=x/v
t=400/280
t=1.43 s

Vertical:
t=1.43 s
a=9.8 m/s^2
y0=0
y=?

y=1/2(a)(t^2)
y=1/2(9.8)(1.43)^2
y=9.8(2.04)^2

y=20 ft tall.

Is this correct? If so, why didn't I have to half my answer?

Thanks in advance! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your algebra is a little fuzzy when you are calculating y. Numbers seem to appear and disappear without reason.

Also, the problem distances are given in feet, and you are using g = 9.8 m/s^2. I hope you realize that feet and meters can't be used interchangeably.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "numbers". Would you mind elaborating which ones? Part of it may have been done mentally.
Yes, I realize that feet and meters can't be used interchangeably, I just got used to using meters and forgot to convert. However, is converting essential for this problem? I don't see a step where the units clash, but I could just be looking over one. It looks like I have feet with feet and meters with meters throughout the problem, but again, I could be wrong. Same for the other problem. Are my answers incorrect, or were you just pointing out areas where you thought I may be unclear? Thanks again!
 
Medgirl314 said:

Homework Statement



An arrow is fired horizontally off a cliff. The initial speed of the arrow is 280 ft/s and the arrow lands 400 feet from the base of the cliff. How high is the cliff?

Homework Equations


t=x/v
y=1/2(a)(t^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the horizontal component first.

xinitial=400
a=0
vinital=280 ft/s
x=vt
t=x/v
t=400/280
t=1.43 s

Vertical:
t=1.43 s
a=9.8 m/s^2
y0=0
y=?

y=1/2(a)(t^2)
y=1/2(9.8)(1.43)^2
y=9.8(2.04)^2

y=20 ft tall.

Is this correct? If so, why didn't I have to half my answer?

Thanks in advance! :smile:

Specifically:

y=1/2(a)(t^2)
y=1/2(9.8)(1.43)^2 - I understand this, since you have previously solved for t

But a = 9.8 m/s^2, and if you multiply 9.8 m/s^2 by time squared, your remaining units will be meters, not feet.


y=9.8(2.04)^2 - where does 2.04 come from? What happened to the (1/2) and t = 1.43 s?

y=20 ft tall. - Again, how did you arrive at this answer from the previous step?
 
Ah, I see. Okay, the 2.04 came from squaring the 1.43. I just left the ^2 on, oops. I multiplied the 9.8 by the 2.04 to get 19.992, and rounded to 20. The units should have been meters. Do I half the answer? I thought so, but in an example problem my teacher did similar to this, he didn't half the answer, so I thought I may have been missing something cancel out.

Thanks again!
 
You cannot just dump the 1/2 ...it is part of the equation. Also, please determine the height of the cliff in feet! You may use g = 32.2. ft/sec^2.
 
Medgirl314,
In your earlier thread,Please read the posts on why you can't use feet and meters interchangeably.
 
PhantomJay, I didn't think I could just dump the 1/2, but in a previous problem, it seemed that my teacher did, so I thought maybe it canceled out somewhere. I see it doesn't now, so I can fix the problem. Adjacent, I know you can't use feet and meters interchangeably, but I just forgot for these problems and was trying to find where the units imposed a problem. I see where now, so I'll come back to this problem after we finish the other one.

Thanks! :smile:
 
Is the answer 32.9 ft. ?
 
  • #10
Medgirl314 said:
Is the answer 32.9 ft. ?
Right :smile:
 
  • #11
Thanks! :D I should probably round to 33 ft for this problem. Thanks again!
 
Back
Top