How important is experience in QM?

reilly
Science Advisor
Messages
1,077
Reaction score
2
How important is practical experience with quantum mechanics for understanding, as best as one can, the subject?

For example: Weinberg in his QFT tome, briefly discusses QFT three point interactions in terms of angular momentum states. So, he points out that the interaction can be formulated with 3-j symbols. How would you do Born approx. for pion-nucleon scattering in the angular momentum rep .

Or compute the numerical value(s) for the 1p-1s transition for the hydrogen atom, with the Coulomb gauge and non-rel QED.

Does a separable potential in non-rel many-body theory imply and energy gap?

Just curious.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Practical experience with quantum mechanics is very important for understanding the subject. Not only does it provide a hands-on approach to the material, but it also allows one to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts. This is especially true when dealing with more complex topics like scattering theory and many-body systems. By working through these problems, students can gain a better appreciation for the nuances of the mathematical models used to describe quantum systems. Additionally, it can help them to better appreciate how different physical scenarios can lead to vastly different results.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top