How Is Black Hole Entropy Calculated According to Bekenstein-Hawking?

DuncanJames
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Looking for help with a detailed explanation of the Bekenstein-Hawking black hole entropy equation, specifically where the variables and constants come from to form this particular arrangement. The pic shows one form of which I found several. Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Relevant Equations
see attached pic
none
 

Attachments

  • E3C1E0A1-7408-4607-AB44-426CF5910493.jpeg
    E3C1E0A1-7408-4607-AB44-426CF5910493.jpeg
    4.6 KB · Views: 289
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
From where did you find the equation?
Isn't there a description in the write up?
 
256bits said:
From where did you find the equation?
Isn't there a description in the write up?
Thank you for asking. I’ve found it in various forms with varying amounts of description. (This particular one I think came from wikipedia.) To clarify, I know what the factors are. What I’m looking for is an explanation on how they came to be in the same equation. The fact that piques my interest is what happened to pi? Surface area requires 4 pi, so one of the others had to come with pi in the numerator to cancel out pi in the denominator to leave 4 by itself.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top