How Is Electric Potential Difference Calculated from Work and Charge Movement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential difference between two points when moving a -8.50 µC charge, given the work done and the kinetic energy at the final point. The key equations used are V = PE / q and Vba = -W/q. The calculations indicate that the potential at point b is lower than at point a, suggesting that the charge encountered an opposing force during its movement. Confusion arises regarding the reference point for potential energy, with the need to clarify how to determine the zero point of potential energy. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the relationship between work, potential energy, and kinetic energy in electric fields.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The work done by an external force to move a -8.50 mu C charge from point a to point b is 1.90×10^-3 J.

If the charge was started from rest and had 4.86×10^-4 J of kinetic energy when it reached point b, what must be the potential difference between a and b?


Homework Equations



V = PE / q
Vba = - W/q

The Attempt at a Solution



If the charge started from rest, all the energy it had was potential energy which got converted to kinetic energy at point b.

V = 4.86 x 10^-4 / -8.50 x 10^-6 C
V at point a = -57.176

Vb - (-51.176 V) = -1.90 X 10^-3 J / -8.5 X 10^-6 C

Vb + 51.716 V = 223.5 V
Vb = 165.76 (166 V)

I use MasteringPhysics and it told me the answer should have been negative but I don't understand why. My book states "When the electric force does positive work on a charge, the kinetic energy increases and the potential energy decreases. The difference in potential energy, PEb - PEb, is equal to the negative of the work, Wba, done by electric field to move the charge from a to b."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't see how you can know the potential energy at a particular point - what are you using for your zero of PE?

From the looks of the numbers - the applied force did much more work than the resultant kinetic energy ... so the charge must have been encountering an opposing force, which means the motion was against an opposing potential. Thus Vb < Va (since negative charges roll uphill).
 
Simon Bridge - Thank you, that makes sense. Initially, I wasn't entirely sure how to approach the problem. I thought I the zero point was at "B" when all the energy was kinetic.
 
I thought I the zero point was at "B" when all the energy was kinetic.
However, you also found a distinct value for Vb.

It looks like you found Vb from Vb - Va = 223.5V (and plug in your value for Va). But Vb-Va is the voltage difference you have been asked to find.

Have you tried expressing everything in terms of change in energy?
 
No, but the next time I come across a problem like this I will express things in terms of ΔU.
 
OK - have fun ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top