How Is Energy Flux Calculated in an Electromagnetic Wave?

AI Thread Summary
The energy density of an electromagnetic wave is expressed as ε_{0}E^{2}, and energy flux is typically calculated by multiplying this by the speed of light, c. This method assumes a constant energy density, which is misleading since the electric field E oscillates periodically. The correct approach involves considering the time-averaged power density, which accounts for the oscillation of E, resulting in a value of (1/2)ε0cEmax^2. This emphasizes the importance of precise terminology in discussing electromagnetic wave properties. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
guillefix
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hello,

The energy density of an electromagnetic wave is ε_{0}E^{2}. To calculate the energy flux, at least in the derivation's I've seen, people just multiply by the speed of the wave, i.e., c. But doesn't this assume that the energy density is constant at all points?; but E changes periodically! Why isn't it then the integral of the energy density in the corresponding volume, so it would give something close to a half of the usual answer i see!?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just read in here: http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/~hutchcroft/Phys258/CN6EMWaves.pdf that I was right yeah. Walter Lewin's lecture was a bit missleading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One has to be very careful with terminology and keep in mind exactly which quantity is being discussed. The instantaneous power density (W/m2) passing through a surface oriented perpendicular to the wave propagation direction is indeed ε0cE2.

However, the magnitude of E oscillates rapidly between 0 and the amplitude Emax (often called E0). Finding the time-average over a whole number of cycles gives half of the maximum power density, so the time-averaged power density (which is what we can actually measure in practice) is (1/2)ε0cEmax2 which is often written as (1/2)ε0cE02.

I haven't watched Levin's lecture so I don't know which terminology he's using.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top