How Is k Normalized in Schrodinger's Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the normalization of the wave number k in Schrödinger's equation for a specific potential distribution divided into three regions. The user successfully derives k as k = √(2mE)/h but struggles with the concept of normalizing k, referred to as k_hat. They find that using the definition of [E] = π²h²/(2ML²) leads to the correct expression for k_hat. The user seeks clarification on how [E] is derived and the purpose of k_hat in the context of their assignment. Ultimately, the normalization process is essential for ensuring the wave function remains physically meaningful.
bumclouds
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Homework Statement


I have an assignment, which is to Solve Schrodinger's equations, for a certain potential distribution, which can be divided up into three regions.

A solution for one of the regions is of the form: Ae^{kx}



If you substitute this into Schrodinger's equation (time independant, one dimension) and solve for k, you get this:

Schrodingers:
\frac{-h}{2m} \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \Psi (x) + Vo \Psi (x) = E \Psi (x)

Solve for k:
k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}

I know this part is right because I've seen it written on the board a couple of times, and it's also what I get on paper.

But then there's the next bit, which I don't get. Apparently it's 'normalising k' which I just don't get..

k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}

k\overline{^}\overline{} = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}.\frac{L}{2}

[E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{E}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{\frac{E[E]}{[E]}}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{[E]} \sqrt{Ehat}

k_hat = \frac{\pi}{2} \sqrt{Ehat}

Homework Equations



None.


The Attempt at a Solution



If I rearrange k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h} and make E the subject,

I get ..

E = \frac{h^{2}khat^{2}}{2m}

and maybe this is where I go wrong.. because I assume E = [E] ?

Subtituting [E] into the second last step in section 2 above yields:

khat = \frac{L}{2} khat \sqrt{Ehat}

and that doesn't equal the last step >_<

EDIT: ahh.. if I use their definition of [E], [E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}
I arrive at the right answer..


so how did they come up with [E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is k_hat and what are you trying to achieve, an expression for E?
 
Sorry! I've edited my above post.. Now it makes more sense :)

What I'm really after is how did they (my teacher) come up with [E] and what is it?


k_hat is apparently a normalised k
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top