How is my text book getting the components of a vector?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the x and y components of a vector B at 130° from the positive x-axis, with a magnitude of 5. The textbook uses a method involving the cosine and sine functions directly, calculating the components as 5(cos130°) and 5(sin130°), which differs from the traditional SOH CAH TOA approach. Participants explain that this method can be understood through the concept of rotation matrices and suggest using double-angle formulas to demonstrate the equivalence of both methods. The discussion emphasizes the efficiency of the textbook's approach compared to constructing a right triangle. Understanding the rotation matrix concept can enhance comprehension of how angles affect vector components.
student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


My textbook shows a vector B 130° from the positive x-axis. B has a value of 5; it asks for the x and y components for B.

But they show a way other than SOH CAH TOA. They got the x component by multiplying 5(cos130°) and the y component by multiplying 5(sin130°). What is this method?


Homework Equations


All I know is SOH CAH TOA, but that obviously will not work in this case.


The Attempt at a Solution


I can easily figure it out by putting B into a right triangle to get the x and y components. But I am interested in learning this technique too which I apparently missed some where along the way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the usual method. sin and cos are defined for angles greater than 90, they can also be reduced
5(cos130°)=-5(cos50°)
5(sin130°)=5(sin50°)
 
(@student34)
I'm guessing the way you did it was to consider the triangle between the line and the y-axis (or x axis), then relate this to the x and y components with respect to the origin? This way is fine, but yeah, their way is faster.

Do you know how to use double-angle formula? You can use this to show why their method and your method both give the same result. hint: 130=90+40 and use this in the double-angle formula.

Fundamentally, their method is using a rotation matrix to rotate the line counter-clockwise. are you familiar with rotation matrix? You can sort of justify their method by drawing a couple of different positions of the line, and seeing how the angle changes and how that changes the x and y components. (try this out, I think it helps give a feel for what is going on)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top