How is power proportional to acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between power, acceleration, and distance, particularly under the assumption of constant mass and distance. Participants critique the initial formula for power, emphasizing that distance should represent a change rather than a constant value. They argue that the assertion of power being proportional to acceleration is flawed, as acceleration cannot be constant if distance is held constant. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between average power and instantaneous power, noting that average power calculations can mislead interpretations of proportionality. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial reasoning lacks a proper understanding of the physical principles involved.
hola
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The above scenario is when distance and mass are held constant. ~ denotes proportional to
My work:
P= m*a*d/t
P~ a/t

a~1/t^2 when m and d are held constant

so P~ a^3/2

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is important to say that you assumed a constant force. (what does 'd held constant' mean anyway?)

Personally, I don't see a flaw in your reasoning.

But wait 'til it gets approved or demolished by someone more knowledgeable before you start expecting your nobel prize.
 
Is this right?

Absolutely not. If you think that you can "hold d constant" and still have a non-zero energy transfer rate (power) then you don't even understand work. The error in your mathematics is the point when you say:

P= m*a*d/t

It should be:

P= m*a*(d(t)-d0)/(t-t0)

In other words, d should be "delta d" or "the change in d". But more importantly, on a physical level you are talking about transfering energy by accelerating in place, which is absurd.


"a~1/t^2 when m and d are held constant" This is mathematically laughable. Acceleration is the second derivative of position. If position is a constant, acceleration is zero.
 
Crosson: most people use "d" for distance, which is (x_f - x_i),
and it was pretty clear from the context.

Hola: your condition shows power proportional to a/t ,
(with fixed distance and mass). This is NOT proportional to a,
since the time to travel distance "d" is NOT the same for different P.
This is obvious since higher power run will have quicker acceleration
(your formulas presume CONTANT-ACCELERATION during each run)
By the way, this is *Average* power!
 
I'm not sure I see your point lightgrav. I'll rewrite hola's work with more precision. Asume an object of mass m at rest at t_0 = 0 acted on my a constant force F, from which results an acceleration a. Then, after a time t', the object has traveled a distance d, and the rate at which work as been done by force (the power) for that period is P = Fd/t' = mad/t'. But since the force is constant, the equation of position of the object is x(t) = 0.5at², for which we know a solution to be d = 0.5at'² <==> t&#039; = \sqrt{2d/a}. Hence we can rewrite the power for that particular trajectory of the object as

P = \frac{mad}{\sqrt{2d/a}} = \frac{ma\sqrt{ad}}{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{d}{2}}ma^{3/2}
 
Point #1 : the title prase "Power proportional to acceleration" does not apply
to P~a/t nor to P~a^3/2 . (Does Hola know what proportional means?)
Point #2 : "average Power over a given distance" is not the same thing as P.
Unmodified, unqualified Power seems to misleadingly imply constant P,
or that it is a relationship that could be used in most any situation.
But knowing that P ~ F.v ~ a.v makes it obvious that here (a=const) P ~ t .
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top