How Is Temperature Defined in Kelvin Using Fundamental Units?

AI Thread Summary
Temperature in Kelvin can be defined using the relationship kT=hf, where k is the Boltzmann constant and h is Planck's constant, with f representing the frequency of oscillation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using fundamental units of mass, length, and time, suggesting that Planck units are relevant for this definition. There is some uncertainty about how to construct the Kelvin without referencing specific isotopes, but it is noted that fixed values for k and h can help in this context. The conversation highlights the challenge of defining frequency in a way that aligns with the fundamental unit approach. Ultimately, the definition of temperature in Kelvin can be approached through these established constants and relationships.
"pi"mp
Messages
129
Reaction score
1
Hi all,
I'm reading through Zwiebach's String Theory text on my own and am thinking about one of his very elementary exercises on "units." We are asked to define temperature in Kelvin with reference to the fundamental units of mass, length, and time. My thought is the following:

We take kT=hf where here f is the frequency of oscillation of Cs-133 radiation at that temperature since that is how the "second" is defined. Then we will have defined the temperature T (in Kelvin) in terms of only numerical quantities whose value we know (k and h) and f.

I'm not very confident about this at all but I'm not sure how else to do it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the usual way to make units less dependent on specific setups, indeed. I think "fundamental units of mass, length and time" are the Planck units here, not specific transition in some specific isotope.
 
Ah okay, so how would I go about constructing the Kelvin that way?
 
You can just use kT=hf as definition, with fixed values for k and h (in Planck units, h has a known value anyway). The value of k is arbitrary.
 
hmm okay. But then what would "f" be? I thought you said we ought not refer to a specific isotope or anything like that.
 
The Planck units have something you can use there.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top