What is the total moment of inertia using the negative area method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benjamin_harsh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Length
AI Thread Summary
The total moment of inertia using the negative area method is calculated by combining the moments of inertia of individual sections, accounting for their areas and distances from the centroid. The formula is adjusted to reflect the negative contributions from sections two and three, leading to a simplified equation of I_total = I_1 - 2I_2. Specific calculations yield I_1 as 1.611 x 10^8 mm^4 and I_2 and I_3 as 1.701 x 10^7 mm^4 each. The discussion highlights the importance of clearly defining dimensions in diagrams, particularly the web width, to avoid ambiguity in solving the problem. Accurate representation of all dimensions is crucial for correct calculations in structural analysis.
Benjamin_harsh
Messages
211
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
What is the area moment of inertia for this problem?
Relevant Equations
##I_{2} = I_{3} = \large\frac{1}{12}\normalsize bh^{3} = \large \frac{1}{12}\normalsize *35*(180 mm)^{4} = 1.701*10^{7} mm^{4}##
##I_{total} = (I_{1} + A_{1}d_{1}^{2} ) + (I_{2} + A_{2}d_{2}^{2}) + (I_{3} + A_{3}d_{3}^{2})##(d is the distance between centroid of the individual box and centroid of whole shape.)
245035

By negative area method by joining the gaps in I section.

245036


##I_{total} = (I_{1} + A_{1}d_{1}^{2} ) - (I_{2} + A_{2}d_{2}^{2}) -(I_{3} + A_{3}d_{3}^{2})##

Centroid of two new sections matches with centroid of final shape. So ##d_{1}##, ##d_{2}## and ##d_{3}## are zero.

##I_{total} = (I_{1} - I_{2} - I_{3})##

Moment of Inertia of a Rectangle 1,##I_{1} = \large \frac {1}{12}\normalsize bh^{3} = \large \frac {1}{12}\normalsize 110*260^{3}

= 1.611 * 10^{8}mm^{4}##

Moment of Inertia of a Rectangle 2 and 3 are equal because they have similar dimensions ##I_{2} = I_{3} = \large\frac{1}{12}\normalsize bh^{3} = \large \frac{1}{12}\normalsize *35*(180 mm)^{4} = 1.701*10^{7} mm^{4}##

Area moment of Interia, ##I_{total} = I_{1} - 2I_{2} = 1.272*10^{8} mm^{4}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Problem assumes I guess that the web width is 40 mm (same as flange width) but the dimension should have been shown on the drawing.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Problem assumes I guess that the web width is 40 mm (same as flange width) but the dimension should have been shown on the drawing.
Are you saying that taking 35 as base is wrong?
 
No, I am saying it is correct if the width of the middle vertical rectangle is assumed to be 40mm. The drawing does not show that width, which it should have, because the problem otherwise could not be solved with incomplete information given.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top