How is the Centrifugal Force Derived from Scalar Potentials?

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The centrifugal force is
$$
\Omega\times r\times \Omega
$$

I paper I am reading then writes it as ##\frac{1}{2}(r\Omega)^2 - \frac{1}{2}\Omega^2r^2##

How was this obtained?

Using the fact that ##a\times b\times c = (ac)b - (ab)c##, I don't get what they are getting so there is something else that I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dustinsfl said:
The centrifugal force is
$$
\Omega\times r\times \Omega
$$

I paper I am reading then writes it as ##\frac{1}{2}(r\Omega)^2 - \frac{1}{2}\Omega^2r^2##

How was this obtained?

Using the fact that ##a\times b\times c = (ac)b - (ab)c##, I don't get what they are getting so there is something else that I am missing.
Is there something assumed about a relationship between Ω and r ?

Is Ω precessing about r, or vice-versa ?

##\Omega\times r\times \Omega\ ## is a vector.

##\frac{1}{2}(r\Omega)^2 - \frac{1}{2}\Omega^2r^2## is a scalar .
 
Dustinsfl said:
The centrifugal force is
$$
\Omega\times r\times \Omega
$$

I paper I am reading then writes it as ##\frac{1}{2}(r\Omega)^2 - \frac{1}{2}\Omega^2r^2##

How was this obtained?

Using the fact that ##a\times b\times c = (ac)b - (ab)c##, I don't get what they are getting so there is something else that I am missing.
As written, that's a scalar, it has the wrong units for force, and it's zero.

However, ##\frac 1 2 (\vec r\cdot\vec{\Omega})^2 - \frac 1 2 \Omega^2 r^2## is something very different. It's still a scalar, it still has the wrong units for a force, but it is a rather special scalar. It's the centrifugal potential. Take the gradient with respect to ##\vec r## and negate and you'll get the centrifugal force.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top