How is the first multipole calculated from the Plank Study?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jules Winnfield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Multipole Study
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The first multipole from the Planck 2013 Results is calculated using the angular scale of 0.0104147 radians, which corresponds to an angle of 0.60 degrees. The Power Spectrum chart indicates the first multipole at l = 220. The relationship used for this calculation is θ = 180°/l, leading to a peak at l = 302 when considering the angular scale. It is crucial to note that the graph displays power multiplied by l(l+1), which may represent a different l-dependent prefactor affecting the interpretation of the angular scale.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multipole expansion in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the Planck 2013 Results and their significance
  • Knowledge of angular scale calculations
  • Ability to interpret Power Spectrum graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of multipole moments in cosmology
  • Learn about the implications of the Planck 2013 Power Spectrum
  • Explore the relationship between angular scale and multipole moments
  • Investigate the significance of l(l+1) in Power Spectrum analysis
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers studying the cosmic microwave background and the implications of multipole analysis in cosmology.

Jules Winnfield
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Reading through the Plank 2013 Results we can see that the angular scale is ##0.0104147## or ##0.60^\circ##. However, the Power Spectrum chart clearly shows the first multipole at ##220## ##l##. Using the relation $$\theta = \frac {180^\circ}{l},$$I calculate the first multipole to peak at ##302## ##l##. Would someone please show the steps of how you go from ##0.0104147## to ##220## ##l##?
 
Be careful with the graph. It does not show the power, it shows the power multiplied by l(l+1). The calculation of the angular scale might measure the peak of something else, i. e. with a different l-dependent prefactor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K