How Is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Derived?

AI Thread Summary
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is derived using the integral version of the Schwarz inequality applied to wavefunctions, leading to the relation ΔxΔp ≥ ℏ/2. The derivation involves understanding the commutator of position and momentum operators, where [x, p] = iℏ. Variance in quantum mechanics is also discussed, emphasizing the relationship between the variances of position and momentum. The derivation can be extended to other non-commuting operators, such as angular momentum. This explanation provides a comprehensive understanding of the principle and its mathematical foundations.
Messages
19,772
Reaction score
10,723
Definition/Summary

One of the most asked questions is concerning how to derive the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation.

Starting from almost basic concepts of Quantum Mechanics, a derivation is given here. Some details are left as minor exercises for the interested reader.

The derivation on this page is based on the integral version of the Schwarz inequality, applied to wavefunctions.

An alternative derivation, based on the expectation value version, and applied to bras and kets, is on the page "uncertainty principle".

Equations

\Delta x\Delta p \geq \hbar/2

Extended explanation

For understanding this derivation, one might need to pick up results from library items on Schwarz inequality and hermitian operators.

The commutator of two operators A and B is defined as:
\left[ A,B \right] = AB - BA.

Some commutator algebra:
\left[ A,B + C \right] = \left[ A,B \right] + \left[ A,C \right] .
\left[ A,q \right] = 0 , if q is a constant.

The commutator for position and momentum in quantum mechanics (QM) is standard knowledge for a student of QM, thus the result is given here without proof:
\left[ x,p \right] = \left[ x, -i\hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right] = i\hbar .
To prove this, act with this commutator on a test function.

Now let us consider the variance in QM:
(\Delta x ) ^2 = \int \psi^*(\Delta x ) ^2\psi dx
( \Delta x ) = x - <x>
Now we have this very nice relation:
\left[ \Delta x,\Delta p \right] = \left[ x,p\right] = i \hbar, as an exercise, show this.


Now substitute a(x) = A\psi (x) and b(x) = B\psi (x) in the Schwarz inequality:

\int(A\psi)^*(A\psi)dx\int(B\psi)^*(B\psi)dx = <A^2><B^2> \geq \left| \int (A\psi)^*(B\psi) dx \right|^2 = \left| \int \psi^*(A(B\psi)) dx \right|^2

Write:
\int \psi^* AB \psi dx = \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB+BA) \psi dx + \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB-BA) \psi dx

We have:
<A^2><B^2> \geq \left| \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB+BA) \psi dx + \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB-BA) \psi dx \right|^2 \Rightarrow

Standard algebra: |a+b|^2 \geq |a|^2 + |b|^2
<A^2><B^2> \geq \frac{1}{4}\left| \int \psi^* (AB+BA) \psi dx \right|^2+ \frac{1}{4}\left|\int \psi^* (AB-BA) \psi dx \right|^2

The first term on the right hand side is a number greater than zero (it is equal to the integral I which is real, real number squared is a number greater than zero). So the lower limit is:
<A^2><B^2> \geq \frac{1}{4}\left|\int \psi^* \left[ A,B \right] \psi dx \right|^2

Make substituion A \rightarrow \Delta x and B \rightarrow \Delta p and use the fact that the expectation value of variance is equal to the variance, and that wavefunctions are normalized to unity:

(\Delta x)^2(\Delta p)^2 \geq \frac{1}{4} \left|\int \psi^* \left[ \Delta x,\Delta p \right] \psi dx \right|^2
(\Delta x)^2(\Delta p)^2 \geq \frac{1}{4} (-i\hbar)(i\hbar)\cdot 1 = \hbar ^2/4

Thus:
\Delta x\Delta p \geq \hbar/2

Consider Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - Derivation (II) for same result obtained in bra-ket notation.

We can also choose to perform this uncertainty with any two operators. It will become interesting if we consider two operators which does not commute. e.g let us consider the angular momentum operators, which have the following commutator:

[ L_x, L_y] = i\hbar L_z

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a great explanation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and how to derive it. It is helpful to have the equations, extended explanations, and examples provided. I am looking forward to learning more about this principle and the bra-ket notation mentioned!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...
Back
Top