How is the kinetic energy of a falling rod on a frictionless surface calculated?

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic energy of a falling rod on a frictionless surface is calculated using the expression T = 1/2 I ω^2, where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity. For the rod, the moment of inertia is I = M(L/2)^2, leading to T = 1/8 M L^2 (sin²θ + 1/3) when considering both translational and rotational motion. The discussion also addresses finding the rate of change of the vertical position of the center of mass, dy/dt, which involves the angle θ and gravitational acceleration g. The derived formula for dy/dt incorporates the sine of θ and the square root of a function involving g, L, and θ. Understanding these calculations is essential for accurately modeling the dynamics of the rod's motion.
dowjonez
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
A thin homogeneous rod hsa length L and mass M. Initially the rod is vertical at rest on a frictionless surface. The rod is given a slight push and begins to fall in the gravitational field.

1) write an expression for the kinetic energy T of the rod as functions of M,L,g, theta and d theta/dt

2) if y is the distance the center of mass drops. find d y/dt as a function of L, g and theta



#1)i know the Kinetic energy of the rod is given by the equation

T= 1/2 I w^2

where w = omega = d theta/dt
and I = M(L/2)^2

so T = 1/2 M(L/2)^2 d theta/dt^2

T = 1/8 M L^2 d theta/dt^2

The answer is T = 1/8 M L^2 d theta/dt^2 (Sin^2theta + 1/3)

i don't know where the (Sin^2theta + 1/3) comes from


#2)


i don't even know where to start on this one

but the answer is Y prime = sintheta sqrt ( (3gL(1-costheta) / 4-3cos^2theta)


any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dowjonez said:
#1)i know the Kinetic energy of the rod is given by the equation

T= 1/2 I w^2
That would be true if the rod were purely rotating, but it's also translating: the total KE is the sum of the translational KE (of the cm) and the rotational KE (about the cm).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top