How Is the Mass of Mars Calculated Using Orbital Data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamkristing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of Mars using data from the Mars Odyssey spacecraft, which operates at an average altitude of 419.5 km and has an orbital period of 1.964 hours. The initial calculation yielded a mass of Mars at 4.26e21 kg, significantly lower than the actual mass of 6.42e23 kg. Participants emphasized the importance of unit conversion, particularly from kilometers to meters and km/hr to m/sec, in achieving accurate results. They also suggested using the velocity formula for circular orbits to derive the mass more effectively. Properly showing calculations and understanding the energy expressions involved were highlighted as crucial for resolving discrepancies.
iamkristing
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Mars Odyssey spacecraft was launched on April 7, 2001. It underwent orbital insertion. To minimize the amount of fuel required for the insertion process, a highly elliptical orbit was chosen, but circular orbits are far superior for the type of mapping work in which the Mars Odyssey will engage. The elliptical insertion orbit was therefore slowly circularized using an Aerobreaking maneuver that lasted several yrs. Currently, the Mars Odyssey is collecting data at an average orbital altitude of 419.5 km and an orbital period of 1.964 hours. From these data alone, plus the raduis of Mars (3395 km), determine the mass of Mars.

Homework Equations



E= .5mv^2 - (GMm)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the velocity of the spacecraft by dividing the circumference of the orbit by the time and got 12203.2 km/hr

Now i used the equation above. Both m's cancel and i solved for M. I got a value of 4.26e21.

Now the actual mass of Mars is 6.42e23.

Any help is appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you used the value for G as 6.67 x 10^-11 , that is in SI metric units, which are kilograms, meters and seconds, did you convert your distances from kilometers to meters? Did you convert your velocity from km/hr to m/sec? When you used the radius of the orbit, did you use the radius of Mars plus the average altitude?

As a tip, when asking for help with a calculation here, it is a good idea to show your work, rather than just asking about your results. It is pretty difficult to see where you may have made an error if we can't see what you were doing...
 
Thanks I did mess up on the units. And ill make sure to write it out next time!
 
I corrected the units and still am off. Is the theory/formulas I used correct?
 
I couldn't say exactly. You only wrote the mechanical energy expression for gravity. What did you use for the value of E? (For that matter, how would you know what to use for E?)

You will probably be better off to do this. Do you know the expression for the velocity of a circular orbit of radius R around a body of mass M? You found a value for that velocity and you know the radius, so you can solve for M from there.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top