How Is the Speed of a Man Calculated When Running Across a Boat Moving Upstream?

AI Thread Summary
A boat moves upstream at 14 km/h against a river current of 6 km/h, while a man runs across the boat at 6 km/h. The calculation for the man's speed relative to the ground involves treating the velocities as vectors, with the man's speed being perpendicular to the boat's movement. The correct speed of the man relative to the ground is determined to be 10 km/h, despite initial confusion over the calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of interpreting the wording of the question accurately to avoid ambiguity.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
A boat is traveling upstream at 14 km/h with respect to a river that is flowing at 6 km/h (with respect to the ground). A man runs directly across the boat, from one side to the other, at 6 km/h (with respect to the boat). The speed of the man to the ground is ____?

Attempt:

vPG = vPB + vBW + vWG
vPG = 6 km/h + 14 km/h - 6 km/h = 14 km/h

That is not the correct answer, though. The answer is 10 km/h. I keep trying different methods but this seems to be the most correct solution...but it's not.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A man runs directly across the boat, from one side to the other, at 6 km/h
... which direction is he running compared with the direction the boat is moving?
 
You'll need to treat the velocities as vectors (taking into account that VPB is perpendicular to VBW and VWG).
 
Simon Bridge said:
... which direction is he running compared with the direction the boat is moving?

That is the question word for word, and I agree that it is ambiguous.
 
TSny said:
You'll need to treat the velocities as vectors (taking into account that VPB is perpendicular to VBW and VWG).

Okay...I treated it as vBW and vPB as parallel since that's what my impression was from reading the question.

I guess that clears up things quite nicely. Thanks.
 
That is the question word for word, and I agree that it is ambiguous.
I don't think it was ambiguous at all - I was trying to direct your attention to the wording.
But you got there in the end.

It can be tricky interpreting word questions. For future reference:

The question says he runs "from one side to the other" ... which would be 90deg to the direction of travel, unless the boat was traveling sideways or something.

The "boat traveling sideways" is the sort of thing the question would make a point of telling you ;)

If he were running parallel to the direction of travel, then he's be going from "front to back" or "from bow to stern" or similar description.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top