How is the spin force related to electromagnetic wave curl and vector calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtleafs33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Force Spin
jtleafs33
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I put this in the math forum because although it's for my EM waves class, it's a math question.

Show that the spin force can be written as:

F_{spin}=\frac{-1}{2}Im(\alpha)Im(E\cdot\nabla E^{*})=\nabla\times L_s

Find L_s.

Where \alpha is complex. I'm using E^{*} to denote the complex conjugate of E. Also, since these are all vectors, I'm omitting the arrow notation atop the vector quantities.

Homework Equations



Im(z)=\frac{1}{2i}(z-z^{*})

The Attempt at a Solution



From the relevant equations:
Im(\alpha)=\frac{1}{2i}[\alpha-\alpha^{*}]
Im(E\cdot\nabla E^{*})=\frac{1}{2i}[E\cdot\nabla E^{*}-(E\cdot\nabla E^{*})^{*}]

Substituting in,
F_{spin}=\frac{1}{8}[\alpha-\alpha^{*}][E\cdot\nabla E^{*}-(E\cdot\nabla E^{*})^{*}]=\nabla\times L_s

Here, in order to make a curl appear, I'd like to apply the identity:
\nabla\times(A\times B)=A(\nabla\cdot B)-B(\nabla\cdot A)+(B\cdot\nabla)A-(A\cdot\nabla)B

However, I'm not sure what the quantity [(E\cdot\nabla E^{*})^{*}] looks like... I don't know how to conjugate this and I'm stuck here for the moment.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If E is a vector then I'm not sure what ∇E means. ∇.E would be a scalar, making E.(∇.E) problematic. Do you mean ∇×E?
 
E is the electric field vector. it is a function of position and time, so that's just its gradient vector, also a function of position and time.
 
jtleafs33 said:
E is the electric field vector. it is a function of position and time, so that's just its gradient vector, also a function of position and time.
If you have a scalar field f, then ∇f = grad f is the gradient vector. But here you say E is a vector, so I'm at a loss to understand what ∇E represents. See item e) at http://www.math.ucla.edu/~ronmiech/Calculus_Problems/32B/chap14/section5/930d31/930_31.html
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top