How Is the Spring Constant Calculated for a Bungee Jump?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant for a bungee cord based on a scenario involving a diver jumping from a bridge. The diver's weight and the dynamics of the fall are considered, particularly how energy conservation principles apply to the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore energy conservation, questioning how gravitational potential energy and spring potential energy relate during the diver's fall. There is discussion on the role of the bungee cord's force and whether it contributes to the energy balance at different points in the fall.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on analyzing the energy at various points in the dive, suggesting a conservation of energy approach. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the work done by the bungee cord and its effect on the total energy of the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining reference points for potential energy and the assumptions made about the forces acting on the diver throughout the fall. The problem is framed within the context of a test scenario, which may limit the availability of additional information or confirmation of answers.

joex444
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
From a test I had:

A 700N bungee diver is released from a 40m bridge attached to a bungee cord which is 25m when unstretched. The cord obeys Hooke's Law. Find the spring constant of the cord if the diver is to stop 4m above the surface.

What I did was say that gravity pulls this diver down 36m, and W=Fd=700*36. Now, when the cord actually gets him stopped, all that energy is potential spring energy, and with the distance the cord is stretched from equilibrium being 11m, 1/2kx^2 = mgh is easy to find. I ended up with 416N/m. However, the only force acting on the diver is gravity from 0 to 25m. From 25 to 36m, though, the cord is acting. But, isn't the cord only acting to decrease the Ke gained during the 25m fall, and to also decrease the GPE the diver has as he continues to fall from 25 to 36m?? Or did I do this right and all the energy that the cord has at the bottom of the fall is solely due to gravity, thus, mgh?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These are the proper guidelines to your analysis:

Consider some reference point in the y-axis, let the bridge at 40meters above the river equal to potential zero. Going down you will get negative gravitational potential.

Quickly find the total energy before he jumps (hint: potential only). Let this be time 0. Then start your real analysis when the diver reaches 25 meters below the bridge (what is his speed then?). Let this be time 1, then:

KE0 + PEgrav0 = KE1 + PEgrav1 + PErope1 = KE2 + PEgrav2 + PErope2

At time 2, is when the diver reaches the bottom (4 meters above surface), KE2 = 0. What are the values of the other terms in the conservation equation?
 
So, since total energy is conserved, would that just simplify to

PEgrav0 = PErope2 ?

I believe it would so long as it's not actually:

PEgrav0 + Wrope = PErope2

So...does the work do any rope that would make the potential spring energy of the rope GREATER than the potential energy of the diver 40m high on the bridge (though, since he will stop 4m above, it's 36m worth of PEgrav). If it doesn't, then it doesn't actually matter what is happening at 25m. Now, if the rope did work on the diver, then, it would be 1/2kx^2...and I would endup with mgh + 1/2kx^2 = 1/2kx^2 which means mgh=0 which isn't true.

If Wrope doesn't exist, or perhaps, equals 0, then 1/2kx^2 = mgh = 700*36. Hence, kx^2=50,400. x=36-25=11. Therefore, 50,400/11^2 = k = 416.5 N/m.

Ok, so I've done this problem several times and keep getting 416N/m. Since it's from a test and not HW, I don't know the answer. From the problem, is my work right, and thus the answer?
 
All these Forces are conservative (with a PE function).
Skipping over the intermediate points (at 25m, 26m, 27m...)
looks like mgh_top = ½ k x^2 to me. k = 416 N/m . Good job.
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K