How Is the Work Function of Silver Determined from Cut-off Wavelength?

AI Thread Summary
The work function for silver is calculated using the cut-off wavelength of 325 nm, resulting in a value of approximately 6.11 x 10^-19 J. To find the maximum kinetic energy and speed of electrons ejected by ultraviolet light at 254 nm, the photon energy must first be determined using the equation E = hf. The work function is derived by setting the maximum kinetic energy to zero at the cut-off wavelength. To convert the work function from joules to electron-volts, divide by 1.6 x 10^-19. Understanding these calculations is crucial for solving problems related to photoelectric effects in metals.
Jas014
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The wavelength associated with the cut-off frequency, for silver is 325 nm.

a) What is the work function for silver?
b) Find the maximum kinetic energy and speed of the electrons ejected from a silver surface by ultraviolet light of wavelength 254nm


Homework Equations



f= c/325nm


The Attempt at a Solution



f = c/3.25 * 10 ^ -7 = 9.23 * 10 ^ 14

9.23 * 10 ^14 = hc/325e - work function
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try writing the equations completely before you begin to substitute any numbers. The photon energy is: E = hf = hc/lambda = work function + KE_max. The work function is determined by setting KE_max to zero and using the value of your cutoff frequency or wavelength. For part (a), the work function is your only unknown. Once you get it, you can go to part (b) and change the value of the wavelength.
 
Last edited:
I went

lamda = hc / work function
workfuntion = hc/lamda = 6.626 * 10 ^-34 ( 3 * 10 ^8) / 3.25 * 10 ^ -7 = 6. 11 * 10 - 19

Now I am not sure if i take that number and multiply it by 1.6 * 10 ^ -19?
 
Jas014 said:
I went

lamda = hc / work function
workfuntion = hc/lamda = 6.626 * 10 ^-34 ( 3 * 10 ^8) / 3.25 * 10 ^ -7 = 6. 11 * 10 - 19 J

Now I am not sure if i take that number and multiply it by 1.6 * 10 ^ -19?

If you divide 1.6 \times 10^{-19} , the resulting number will be in eV. So if you want the units to electron-volts, you divide.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top