How is this Bio-mass power plant plausible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a biomass power plant claiming to generate 29 MW of electricity through a steam cycle process. Concerns are raised about the plant's claimed efficiency of 73%, which seems unrealistic given the necessary temperature differentials for such efficiency, likely exceeding material limits for turbine construction. The calculations suggest that the energy conversion rates and efficiency claims appear suspicious, especially when compared to conventional coal and gas-fired plants. The project is still in the conceptual phase, raising questions about the thoroughness of the design and potential oversights by the proposing company. Overall, the intern seeks validation of these concerns before addressing them with superiors, highlighting the importance of due diligence in project assessments.
Starwatcher16
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
How is this Bio-mass [basicaly just a steam power plant] power plant plausible?

It says it is going to supply 29 MW of electricity by burning biomass to heat some fluid (I suppose an ammonia-water mixture, but I really do not know) and turn a turbine (Something like a Rankine cycle I guess). It also says that is will use two boilers capable of consuming 150 tons a day while getting 5200 btu/lb.

29MW*1 day=2.51*10^12 J.

Now, if they turned 100% of that heat energy into mechanical and then electric energy without loss, it would only come out to 3.43*10^12 J/day.

They are claiming they will get this thing to 73% efficency. The problem is, even a carnot engine would need to operate with a temperture difference of around 850 C to achieve this, and since they have no chance of making a system that can match a carnot engine, I would imagine they would really need something like a 1400 C difference.

Isnt that above the creep value of anything they could make the turbines out of?

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your calculation, it seems a little suspicious.
 
diazona said:
I agree with your calculation, it seems a little suspicious.

All the documentation I have seen is really only in the conceptual phase, but the company that submitted it to us to make a bid on it (They want approximate costs of construction so they can start trying to sell it) has already looked like they put a fair amount of work into it (made some isometric drawings and whatnot), which makes me hesitant to think they missed something so basic.

Anyways, I am just an intern, so I wanted to get someone elses input before I asked my boss about this, no reaosn to look like a complete fool on my first week!
 
:smile: well... I hope someone else responds to check this because I also think it's rather surprising that they would have missed something basic like that. Unless they are trying to pull a fast one on your company. And if they are, imagine how much your superiors would love you if you call them on it and save the company from entering into an impossible project ;-) (although I guess it'd be the kind of thing you'd want to bring up discreetly first)
 
Coal-fired power plants (500 - 1000 MW) are roughly 33 - 35% efficient; about 10,000 btu per kilowatt-hour. Gas-fired power plants may be as good as 8,000 btu per kilowatt-hour (40 - 42% efficient).
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top