How is this Statistics Summation Simplified?

olechka722
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This equation comes out of deriving the canonical partition function for some system. However, the question is more math based. I am having trouble understanding the simplification that was performed in the text:

∑ from N=0 to M of: (M!exp((M-2N)a))/(N!(M-N)!) supposedly becomes

exp(Ma)(1+exp(-2a))^M... I tried to look at the first few terms and see how I can simplify this, and no dice... Anyone have any ideas? a is just a constant.

Also, the next step is that the above becomes (2cosh(a))^M Which is great, except, huh? I'm more of a scientist than a math person, so I apologize if I am missing something elementary.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^m \frac{m!}{n!(m-n)!} 1^{(m-n)} b^n = (1 + b)^m<br />

In your sum
<br /> \exp\left((M-2N)a\right) = \exp\left(Ma\right) \cdot \left(\exp(-2a)\right)^N<br />

so your sum is

<br /> \sum_{N=0}^M {\frac{M!}{N!(M-N)!} \exp\left((M-2N)a\right)} <br /> = e^{Ma} \sum_{N=0}^M {\frac{M!}{N!(M-N)!} \left(e^{-2a}\right)^N <br /> = e^{Ma} \left(1 + e^{-2a}\right)^M<br />

For the second one - look at the definition of the hyperbolic function as exponentials, and rearrange terms.
 
Thanks so much! That really clears things up.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top