How Is Work Calculated Along a Semicircle in Vector Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeisenbergW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
HeisenbergW
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the work done along the semicircle (x-1)2+y2=1 from the point (0,0,0) to (2,0,0)
When F=r3cos2φsinφ\hat{r} + r3*cosφ*cos(2φ) \hat{φ}

Homework Equations


Work
W=∫F*dr
where dr=dr= dr\hat{r} + rsinφdφ\hat{φ}

The Attempt at a Solution



I convert the equation of the line (x-1)2+y2=1 to cylindrical coordinates.
Where x=rsinφ
and y=rcosφ
so (x-1)2+y2=1
eventually becomes r=2cosφ

now i plug in this r value into the force vector given, which gives me F=8cos5φsinφ\hat{r} + 8*cos4φ*cos(2φ) \hat{φ}

W=∫F*dr

So now i dot product this with the dr, which is now dr= dr\hat{r} + 2cosφ
sinφdφ\hat{φ} due to the r value I found.

The dot product comes out to be

∫8cos5φsinφdr + 16*cos5φ*cos(2φ)sinφdφ

and because r=2cosφ, dr=-2sinφ dφ

so this is once again plugged into the integral of the dot product, creating

∫-16cos5φsin2φdφ + 16*cos5φ*cos(2φ)sinφdφ

where I integrate from pi/2 to 0, since it ends at x=2 and y=0, but begins at x=0 and y=0

This gives me -4/35, which does not seem to be a correct answer
Any mistakes?
Any help is appreciated
Thank You in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HeisenbergW said:
where dr=dr= dr\hat{r} + rsinφdφ\hat{φ}

The equation is not correct.The second terms has to be rdφ\hat{φ}.
And make the vector \vec{dr} different from dr, change of the coordinate r.


ehild
 
For d\vec{r} I actually left out the second term, which is the elevation angle, since it is constant. I guess I should have clarified that I am using this in spherical coordinates, but I did produce a typo It should be
dr\hat{r}+rsinθd\varphi\hat{\varphi}.
Which of course just simplifies to
dr\hat{r}+rd\varphi\hat{\varphi}
because θ constantly equals pi/2
So you can ignore the lone sin at the end of the force vector, since it goes to one. Yet it still goes to a negative value unfortunately.
 
The integration path is not clear: You can reach from (0.0,0) to (2,0,0) along the upper semicircle or the bottom one, yielding integrals of opposite signs.

ehild
 
My apologies, we must go along the circle where y>0
 
The integral is negative then.

ehild
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top